Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2022 Apr 1.
Published in final edited form as: Home Health Care Serv Q. 2021 Mar 29;40(2):105–120. doi: 10.1080/01621424.2021.1906374

Table 3.

System usability scale (SUS) results.

1. I think I would use this system frequently.
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
0 (0%) 2 (6%) 3 (9%) 22 (65%) 7 (21%)
2. I found the system unnecessarily complex.
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
5 (15%) 21 (62%) 2 (6%) 6 (18%) 0 (0%)
3. I thought the system was easy to use.
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
0 (0%) 2 (6%) 3 (9%) 24 (71%) 5 (15%)
4. I think that I would need the support of a technical person to be able to use this system.
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
4 (12%) 12 (35%) 0 (0%) 13 (38%) 5 (15%)
5. I found the various functions in this system well integrated.
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
0 (0%) 2 (6%) 9 (27%) 19 (56%) 4 (12%)
6. I thought there was too much inconsistency with this system.
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
6 (18%) 21 (62%) 4 (12%) 2 (6%) 1 (3%)
7. I would imagine that most people would learn to use this system very quickly.
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
1 (3%) 2 (6%) 8 (24%) 21 (62%) 2 (6%)
8. I found the system very cumbersome to use.
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
3 (9%) 23 (68%) 0 (0%) 4 (12%) 4 (12%)
9. I felt very confident to use this system.
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
1 (3%) 2 (6%) 2 (6%) 23 (68%) 6 (18%)
10. I need to learn a lot of thinqs before I could qet qoinq with this system.
Strongly disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly agree
4 (12%) 12 (35%) 2 (6%) 12 (35%) 4 (12%)