Comparison table on photocatalytic H2 generation activity of TiO2@5PAn with other TiO2-based photocatalysts.
| Photocatalyst | Light source | Sacrificial agent | H2 rate (μmol h−1 g−1) | Ref. (year) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PAn/g-TiO2 | 300 W Xe | Methanol | 1790 | 39 (2017) |
| PAn-TiO2/RGO | 300 W Xe | Triethanolamine | 806 | 57 (2020) |
| TiO2-RGO | 200 W Xe | Methanol | 740 | 14 (2012) |
| Ag/RGO/TiO2 | 500 W Xe | Methanol | 196 | 58 (2014) |
| Ag2NCN/TiO2 | 300 W Xe | Methanol | 1494 | 59 (2015) |
| Bi2O3/TiO2 | UV-LEDs | Glycerol | 920 | 60 (2017) |
| Pt/Oxamide/TiO2 | 300 W Xe | Triethanolamine | 2370 | 61 (2019) |
| PAn/TiO2 | UV-LEDs | Methanol | 3083 | This work |
| PPy/TiO2 | UV-LEDs | Methanol | 2090 | This work |
| PEDOT/TiO2 | UV-LEDs | Methanol | 1370 | This work |