Skip to main content
. 2020 Spring;19(1):ar10. doi: 10.1187/cbe.19-04-0082

TABLE 4.

Comparison of instructor and student behaviors in CURE and non-CURE contexts, as characterized by the LOPUS

Category Non-CURE (median)a CURE (median)a Mann-Whitney U p valueb
Student behaviors
Typical behaviors
 Listening to instructor (L) 21% 33% 188.50 0.040
 Performing laboratory exercise (Lab) 69% 76% 271.00 0.726
 Test/quiz (TQ) 6% 0% 47.00 <0.001
Interactive behaviors
 Individual student/group asking instructor a question with class listening (SQ) 0% 3% 111.00 <0.001
 Individual student/group asking instructor a question (X1) 9% 21% 166.50 0.012
 Whole-class discussion (WC) 2% 10% 186.50 0.035
 Making predictions (Prd) 0% 2% 169.00 0.004
 Giving a presentation (SP) 0% 0% 240.00 0.039
 Initiating one-on-one interaction with the instructor (SI) 11% 26% 144.00 0.003
 Students interacting with other students in their groups (WG) 75% 82% 255.50 0.503
 Students interacting with peers in another group (BG) 12% 37% 185.50 0.034
Noninstructive behaviors
 Waiting (W) 0% 5% 194.00 0.045
Instructor behaviors
Typical behaviors
 Lecturing to class (Lec) 9% 26% 165.00 0.011
 Real-time writing on the board (RtW) 0% 14% 134.00 <0.001
 Providing follow-up/feedback (FUp) 0% 4% 164.50 0.003
 Demonstration or video (DV) 7% 9% 274.50 0.779
 Monitoring the class/groups (M) 39% 23% 150.50 0.004
Interactive behaviors
 Posing a nonrhetorical question (PQ) 2% 12% 189.50 0.042
 Talking to students/groups one-on-one (Tlk) 36% 63% 183.00 0.030
 Posing a question to individual student or group of students (TPQ) 6% 22% 105.00 <0.001
 Initiating one-on-one interaction with individual student or group of students (TI) 24% 48% 144.00 0.003
Noninstructive behaviors
 Performing administrative tasks (Adm) 35% 16% 122.50 0.001
 Waiting (W/W.1) 13% 0% 128.00 0.001

aValues represent the median of the percentage of time spent on various activities over six laboratory sessions. They do not add up to 100%, because multiple behaviors can be observed during any 2-minute interval.

bPlease note that for both instructor and student behaviors, alpha was established a priori at 0.050, and a Bonferroni correction was applied to adjust for multiple comparisons, where αstudent_adjusted = 0.0042 and αinstructor_adjusted = 0.0045.