TABLE 7.

Means, standard deviations, and spearman correlations between ERLA and self-reported rating of the research experience and overall quality of the mentoring relationship^a

	1	2	3	4	5	6	7	8	9	M	SD
1. Research Comprehension and Communication Skills	—	0.846	0.464	0.865	0.891	0.521	0.696	0.600	0.679	4.13	0.76
2. Practical Research Skills	0.873	—	0.510	0.811	0.816	0.545	0.674	0.549	0.624	3.85	0.90
3. Research Ethics	0.631	0.661	—	0.430	0.396	0.687	0.412	0.293	0.325	2.86	1.37
4. Research Identity	0.824	0.811	0.596	—	0.814	0.439	0.680	0.586	0.666	4.05	0.95
5. Researcher Confidence and Independence	0.888	0.873	0.609	0.848	—	0.476	0.673	0.582	0.664	4.10	0.87
6. Equity and Inclusion Awareness and Skills	0.615	0.603	0.775	0.563	0.600	—	0.408	0.258	0.315	2.94	1.50
7. Professional and Career Development Skills	0.746	0.718	0.593	0.811	0.760	0.573	—	0.434	0.575	3.65	1.19
8. Research Experience	0.563	0.488	0.335	0.505	0.525	0.280	0.446	—	0.778	4.35	0.87
9. Relationship Quality	0.511	0.465	0.278	0.444	0.481	0.255	0.401	0.744	—	4.34	0.86
M	4.19	3.99	3.50	3.93	4.09	3.41	3.77	4.50	4.44
SD	0.69	0.76	1.08	0.87	0.78	1.10	1.01	0.90	0.89

^aPairwise intercorrelations for trainees (N = 482–490) are presented below the diagonal, and intercorrelations for mentors (N = 182–309) are presented above the diagonal. Due to a survey error, several mentors were not presented with the research experience question. Responses for ERLA subscale could range from 1 (no gain) to 5 (great gain). Reponses to research experience and relationship quality could range from 1 (poor) to 5 (excellent). All correlations were statistically significant, p < 0.001.