Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Lang Cogn Neurosci. 2021 Jun 14;37(1):42–62. doi: 10.1080/23273798.2021.1941147

Table 4.

GCA results of the effect of temporal manipulations on N2 activation.

Model Fit
Term −2LL X 2 p
Intercept 7100.8 4.23 0.24
Linear 7096.9 7.79 0.05
Quadratic 7092.2 9.31 0.03
Cubic 7073.3 37.95 <.001
Parameter estimates
Term Est. SE t p
Intercept −0.79 0.11 −7.22 <.001
Linear 3.33 0.50 6.61 <.001
Quadratic −2.88 0.42 −6.79 <.001
Cubic 0.64 0.14 4.55 <.001
Disfluent*Intercept 0.25 0.09 2.85 0.01
Silence*Intercept 0.22 0.09 2.54 0.01
Stretch*Intercept 0.09 0.09 0.97 0.33
Disfluent*Linear −0.86 0.49 −1.74 0.09
Silence*Linear −0.53 0.49 −1.08 0.28
Stretch*Linear −0.41 0.49 −0.84 0.41
Disfluent*Quadratic 1.08 0.42 2.58 0.01
Silence*Quadratic 1.17 0.42 2.80 0.01
Stretch*Quadratic −0.59 0.42 −1.42 0.16
Disfluent*Cubic 1.11 0.20 5.55 <.001
Silence*Cubic 0.39 0.20 1.98 0.05
Stretch*Cubic 0.08 0.20 0.42 0.67

Note: The table provides the test of the overall interaction (model fit) as well as the test of the specific comparisons between the temporal manipulations for each term of the model (intercept, linear, quadratic, and cubic). Results in boldface are presented in the text. LL = log-likelihood.