Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 14;13(24):6285. doi: 10.3390/cancers13246285

Table 1.

Baseline characteristics, prophylaxis, responses, and outcomes of study patients.

Variables Total = 122 (Number, %)
Sex (male) 59 (48.4)
Age, years (median, IQR) 61 (47–70)
AML type at diagnosis
De novo/MRC 97 (79.5)
Secondary 21 (17.2)
Therapy-related 4 (3.3)
AML status at initiation of VEN-based therapy
Newly diagnosed 39 (32.0)
Refractory/relapsed 83 (68.0)
Prior treatment before VEN-based therapy
Naïve 39 (32.0)
Intensive chemotherapy 38 (31.1)
Hypomethylating agents 9 (7.4)
HSCT 36 (29.5)
AML risk group
Favorable 25 (20.5)
Moderate 46 (37.7)
Poor 51 (41.8)
Combination agents
Decitabine 113 (92.6)
Azacitidine 6 (4.9)
Low-dose cytarabine 3 (2.5)
Overall response
CR + CRi 56 (45.9)
MLFS 11 (9.0)
Non response 51 (41.8)
Not available 4 (3.3)
Completion of VEN-based therapy 104 (85.3)
HSCT 46 (44.2)
Non response 24 (23.1)
Death 23 (22.1)
Other reasons 11 (10.6)
Total cycle of VEN-based therapy (median, range) 2 (1–10)
Cycle of response achievement (median, range) 1 (1–4)
Antifungal agents 122 (100)
Empirical or targeted 14 (11.5)
Antifungal prophylaxis 108 (88.5)
Fluconazole 106 (98.1)
Posaconazole 2 (1.9)
Overall mortality 53 (43.4)

AML: acute myeloid leukemia; CR: complete recovery; CRi: complete recovery with incomplete hematologic recovery; HSCT: hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; IQR: interquartile range; MLFS: morphologic leukemia free state; MRC: myelodysplasia-related changes; VEN: venetoclax.