Table 2.
Therapy Family | Relative Risk of Disability Progression c | Rate Ratio for Relapse Rate c | Rate Ratio for New Lesions d | aPBVC e |
---|---|---|---|---|
low efficacy a | 0.52–1.23 | 0.55–0.94 | 0.32–0.89 | −0.51% ± 0.27% |
high efficacy b | 0.25–0.90 | 0.22–0.63 | 0.06–0.42 | −0.27% ± 0.15% |
a Beta interferon, glatiramer acetate, teriflunomide are included. b Alemtuzumab, natalizumab, ocrelizumab are included. c Values are pooled from [17], taking the minimum and maximum bounds from the intervals given for different DMTs in the 2 considered DMT families. See also Appendix A Table A4. d Values are estimated based on the relationship between the relative treatment effect on MRI lesions and the relative treatment effect on relapses, log (relapse_effect) = 0.53 log (lesions_effect) [31]; in other words, the values in columns 3 and 4 are linked through this equation. e Mean ± standard deviation of Gaussian distributions are taken from [22].