Table 1.
SmartFFR values for the original, underestimated and overestimated 3D models of all 20 cases, respectively.
| Case | Original | −5% | 5% |
|---|---|---|---|
| Case 1 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| Case 2 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.95 |
| Case 3 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
| Case 4 | 0.9 | 0.89 | 0.91 |
| Case 5 | 0.91 | 0.9 | 0.92 |
| Case 6 | 0.95 | 0.95 | 0.95 |
| Case 7 | 0.95 | 0.94 | 0.95 |
| Case 8 | 0.92 | 0.91 | 0.93 |
| Case 9 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.97 |
| Case 10 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| Case 11 | 0.93 | 0.92 | 0.94 |
| Case 12 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.98 |
| Case 13 | 0.79 | 0.76 | 0.81 |
| Case 14 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| Case 15 | 0.86 | 0.83 | 0.86 |
| Case 16 | 0.98 | 0.98 | 0.99 |
| Case 17 | 0.96 | 0.96 | 0.96 |
| Case 18 | 0.96 | 0.95 | 0.96 |
| Case 19 | 0.97 | 0.96 | 0.98 |
| Case 20 | 0.98 | 0.97 | 0.98 |