Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 6;10:e70188. doi: 10.7554/eLife.70188

Figure 5. A deep region in GB2 transmembrane domain (TMD) is responsible for agonist activity of the positive allosteric modulator (PAM).

(A) Cartoon highlighting a possible second binding site (dotted oval) for the PAMs in the ancestral ligand binding pocket of the GB2 TMD. In the structure of the inactive state, this pocket is occupied by one molecule of phospholipid (shown as yellow sticks). The residues (α-carbon) of this phospholipid binding pocket (green) and the residues underneath (red) were changed to evaluate their importance in the agonist activity of rac-BHFF. The highly conserved residues L3.36 and Y5.44 were mutated into Ala; G6.53 conserved in GB2 were changed to Thr conserved at this position in GB1, or Phe conserved at this position for other class C GPCRs such as mGlu and CaSR; in Mut 8, the non-conserved residues 7.26NVQ7.28 were mutated in their equivalent in GB2 Drosophila; V7.35 conserved in GB2 (Val or Phe) was changed to Phe. (B) Intracellular Ca2+ responses mediated by the indicated GB2 mutants (M1 to M16) coexpressed with the wild-type GB1 subunit upon stimulation with 30 μM rac-BHFF or 1 mM GABA. Data are normalized by wild-type response and expressed as means ± SEM of three biologically independent experiments. (C) Intracellular Ca2+ responses mediated by the indicated constructs upon stimulation with rac-BHFF in the presence of EC20 GABA of each combination. Data are normalized by wild-type response of 100 μM rac-BHFF + EC20 GABA and shown as means ± SEM. (D) Basal inositol-phosphate-1 (IP1) accumulation mediated by the indicated constructs. Data are normalized by the response of the wild-type and shown as means ± SEM of five biologically independent experiments. Data are analyzed using one-way ANOVA test followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test to determine significance (compared with the WT) with ***p<0.0005, ****p<0.0001. (E) Correlation between the GABAB constitutive activity measured using the Go protein BRET sensor and the rac-BHFF agonist effect for the WT GB1 subunit coexpressed with the indicated GB2 mutants. Data are normalized by the response of the wild-type and shown as means ± SEM. (F) Basal IP1 accumulation mediated by the indicated constructs, including the genetic mutation A567T identified in human GB2 that is equivalent to the mutation A566T in rat. Data are normalized by the response of the WT and shown as means ± SEM of 3–4 biologically independent experiments. Data are analyzed using an unpaired t-test for human, and one-way ANOVA test followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test to determine significance (compared with the WT) for the rat, with *p<0.05, ***p<0.0005, ****p<0.0001. (G) Top view of the sodium binding pocket within the structure of human A2A adenosine receptor (PDB 4EIY) where the three residues important for Na+ interactions are highlighted (Cα in red), the equivalent residues identified in human GB2 TMD (PDB 6UO8), and human mGluR5 TMD (PDB 4OO9); the X.50 numbers shown for A2AAR are equivalent to the numbers in mGluR5 on the basis of X.50 residues defined in Doré et al., 2014; TM2, TM3, and TM7 that contain the residues involving the identified region are highlighted in cyan. (H) Basal IP1 accumulation mediated by the indicated WT and mutated mGlu5 receptors in the presence of the co-transfected glutamate transporter EAAT3. Data are normalized by the response of the WT and shown as means ± SEM of four biologically independent experiments. Data are analyzed using one-way ANOVA test followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test to determine significance (compared with the WT), with **p<0.005. For clarity, the residue numbers for GB2 subunit are based on the sequence of rat GB2. Negative controls (Ctrl) are HEK293 cells co-transfected with the empty vector and Gαqi9 cDNA (B), or Gαo-Rluc and Gβ1γ2-Venus cDNAs in the absence of receptor (E).

Figure 5.

Figure 5—figure supplement 1. Phospholipid binding site in the inactive state of GB1 and GB2 transmembrane domain (TMDs).

Figure 5—figure supplement 1.

(A) The residues changed in the phospholipid (shown as yellow sticks) pocket are highlighted (green) in the two inactive structures of GB2 (PDB 6WIV and 6W2X). The three residues of the deep region investigated in this study are shown in red (only carbon α). (B) The molecule of phospholipid bound (yellow sticks) in both GB1 and GB2 TMDs in the inactive conformations of the GABAB receptor (6WIV and 6W2X) reached the deep region (in red) both in GB1 and GB2 TMDs. The three residues from these deep regions are highlighted (red sticks). To clearly show the bound phospholipid, the TM6 helix is hidden in all structures in (B).
Figure 5—figure supplement 2. Functional characterization of the GB2 subunit mutants in the transmembrane domain (TMD) core.

Figure 5—figure supplement 2.

(A, B) Inositol-phosphate-1 (IP1) production induced by the indicated positive allosteric modulators (PAMs) (A) or basal IP1 accumulation (B) in HEK293 cells expressing the indicated subunit combinations. Data are normalized by wild-type response and shown as means ± SEM of 3–5 biologically independent experiments. Data are analyzed using one-way ANOVA test followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test to determine significance (compared with the WT) with *p<0.05, ***p<0.0005, ****p<0.0001. (C, D) Correlation between the GABAB constitutive activity and the agonist effect of the PAM for the mutants analyzed in panel (A) and for the three PAMs. Negative controls (Ctrl) are HEK293 cells co-transfected with the empty vector and Gαqi9 cDNA.
Figure 5—figure supplement 3. Characterization of the GB2 subunit mutants in the transmembrane domain (TMD) core.

Figure 5—figure supplement 3.

(A) Quantification of cell surface-expressed WT HA-tagged GB1 (top panel) and Flag-tagged GB2 WT or mutants (M; lower panel) by ELISA on intact HEK293 cells co-transfected with the indicated constructs. Data are normalized by the WT receptor and shown as means ± SEM of 3–21 biologically independent experiments. (B, C) Intracellular Ca2+ responses mediated by the indicated GB2 mutants (M1 to M16) coexpressed with the wild-type GB1 subunit upon stimulation with 30 μM rac-BHFF (B) or 1 mM GABA (C). Data are normalized by wild-type receptor and expressed as means ± SEM. Negative controls (Ctrl) are HEK293 cells co-transfected with the empty vector and Gαqi9 cDNA. (D, E) Intracellular Ca2+ responses mediated by the indicated GB2 mutants coexpressed with the WT GB1 subunit upon stimulation with GABA (D) or 30 μM CGP7930 (E). Data are normalized by the WT receptor and shown as means ± SEM of 3–9 biologically independent experiments. Data are analyzed using one-way ANOVA test followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test to determine significance (compared with the WT), with ****p<0.0001.
Figure 5—figure supplement 4. A deep region in GB2 transmembrane domain (TMD) is critical for allosteric agonism.

Figure 5—figure supplement 4.

(A) Intracellular Ca2+ responses mediated by the indicated GB2 mutants upon stimulation with GABA in the absence or presence of 10 μM or 20 μM rac-BHFF. Data are normalized by the response of 1 mM GABA and shown as means ± SEM of six biologically independent experiments. (B) Basal Go BRET ratio mediated by the indicated constructs. Data are normalized by WT response and shown as means ± SEM of three biologically independent experiments. Data are analyzed using one-way ANOVA test followed by a Dunnett’s multiple comparison test to determine significance (compared with the WT), with ****p<0.0001. (C) A simplified mathematical model for the activation of the GABAB receptor by allosteric modulators. Asymmetric arrangement of GB1 and GB2 TMDs for the inactive (R1R2) and active (R1R2*) states free or bound to an allosteric modulator (M). These relative populations are governed by equilibrium constants, α for the basal state, and K and K* for the inactive and active states, respectively. (D) Simulated dose–response curves of rac-BHFF on the WT GABAB receptor (WT) and the mutated receptor (Mut 14 or Mut 15) that has low constitutive activity (α = 100), but its binding parameters for the active (K*) and inactive (K) states are not changed. (E) Inositol-phosphate-1 (IP1) accumulation mediated by the WT and mutant mGlu5 receptors in the presence of the co-transfected glutamate transporter EAAT3 upon stimulation with 100 μM glutamate from a typical experiment that has been repeated three times. Data are expressed as means ± SEM. (F) Quantification of cell surface-expressed Flag-tagged WT and mutant mGlu5 receptors by ELISA after transient transfection of HEK293 cells. Data are normalized by WT response and shown as means ± SEM of three biologically independent experiments.
Figure 5—figure supplement 5. Amino acid sequences alignment of the deep region for both GB1 and GB2.

Figure 5—figure supplement 5.

Sequences are from the National Center for Biotechnology Information Protein database (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov). The alignment is according to full-length GABAB receptor sequence and generated with ClustalW. The three residues from the deep region are highlighted in red background. The species abbreviations are as follows: H. sapiens, Homo sapiens; R. norvegicus, Rattus norvegicus; M. musculus, Mus musculus; B. taurus, Bos taurus; C. sabaeus, Chlorocebus sabaeus; C. ursinus, Callorhinus ursinus; A. mississippiensis, Alligator mississippiensis; A. carolinensis, Anolis carolinensis; B. acutorostrata scammoni, Balaenoptera acutorostrata scammoni; C. lucidus, Collichthys lucidus; D. rerio, Danio rerio; X. tropicalis, Xenopus tropicalis; L. striata domestica, Lonchura striata domestica; D. melanogaster, Drosophila melanogaster; A. gambiae, Anopheles gambiae; P. americana, Periplaneta americana; A. echinatior, Acromyrmex echinatior; E. mexicana, Eufriesea mexicana; C. elegans, Caenorhabditis elegans. The most conserved residue of each transmembrane (TM) (position X.50) is indicated in yellow.
Figure 5—figure supplement 6. Rearrangements of the deep regions between the inactive and active states of the GABAB receptor.

Figure 5—figure supplement 6.

The two inactive structures (6WIV and 7CUM, in orange) are superposed with the three active ones (6UO8 and 7C7Q in green, 7EB2 in blue) for GB1 TMD (top panel) and GB2 TMD (lower panel).