Table 5.
The overall effectiveness of the I-MFO and contender algorithms.
Algorithms | SA (W/T/L) |
CGA (W/T/L) |
GWO (W/T/L) |
MFO (W/T/L) |
WOA (W/T/L) |
LMFO (W/T/L) |
WCMFO (W/T/L) |
ChOA (W/T/L) |
AOA (W/T/L) |
SMFO (W/T/L) |
I-MFO (W/T/L) |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
D = 30 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 2/0/27 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 27/0/2 |
D = 50 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 3/0/26 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 26/0/3 |
D = 100 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 2/0/27 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 0/0/29 | 27/0/2 |
Total | 0/0/87 | 0/0/87 | 0/0/87 | 0/0/87 | 0/0/87 | 0/0/87 | 7/0/80 | 0/0/87 | 0/0/87 | 0/0/87 | 80/0/7 |
OE | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 8% | 0% | 0% | 0% | 92% |