Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 2;11(12):2261. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics11122261

Table 6.

Ultrasound measurements comparison between different regions/levels of the brachial and the antebrachial fascia. Statistically significant results are showed in bold. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01; ****: p < 0.0001. Ns: not statistically significant.

Type of Comparison Mean Diff. 95.00% CI of Diff. Significant? Summary Adjusted p Value
Ant 1 arm vs. Ant 1 forearm −0.12 −0.213 to −0.027 Yes ** 0.0025
Ant 1 arm vs. Ant 2 forearm −0.05 −0.140 to 0.045 No ns 0.7776
Ant 1 arm vs. Post 1 forearm −0.11 −0.197 to −0.011 Yes * 0.0157
Ant 1 arm vs. Post 2 forearm −0.11 −0.202 to −0.016 Yes ** 0.0092
Ant 2 arm vs. Ant 1 forearm −0.11 −0.201 to −0.015 Yes ** 0.0098
Ant 2 arm vs. Ant 2 forearm −0.04 −0.129 to 0.056 No ns 0.9373
Ant 2 arm vs. Post 1 forearm −0.09 −0.186 to −1.345 Yes * 0.0499
Ant 2 arm vs. Post 2 forearm −0.10 −0.191 to −0.005 Yes * 0.0312
Post 1 arm vs. Ant 1 forearm 0.08 −0.012 to 0.174 No ns 0.1444
Post 1 arm vs. Ant 2 forearm 0.15 0.060 to 0.246 Yes **** <0.0001
Post 1 arm vs. Post 1 forearm 0.10 0.003 to 0.20 Yes * 0.0367
Post 1 arm vs. Post 2 forearm 0.09 −0.001 to 0.184 No ns 0.0581
Post 2 arm vs. Ant 1 forearm 0.09 1.345 to 0.20 Yes * 0.0499
Post 2 arm vs. Ant 2 forearm 0.17 0.072 to 0.260 Yes **** <0.0001
Post 2 arm vs. Post1 forearm 0.11 0.020 to 0.205 Yes ** 0.0098
Post 2 arm vs. Post 2 forearm 0.10 0.011 to 0.20 Yes * 0.0168