Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 8;8(12):e29661. doi: 10.2196/29661

Table 4.

Quality assessment of internet- and mobile-based interventions.

Item Study

Brodbeck et al [41] Dominick et al [38] Eisma et al [35] Van der Houwen et al [39] Litz et al [40] Kersting et al [33,34] Wagner et al [36]
Indication

Is the intended purpose of the intervention clearly stated (which psychological symptoms can be alleviated by the intervention, orientation toward current version of the ICDa and empirical evidence regarding the intervention)? Yes Unclear Unclear Unclear Unclear Yes Unclear
Description of the intervention

Is the intervention based on evidence-based theories and techniques of psychotherapy? Are these theories and techniques clearly stated? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Information whether intervention is guided or unguided Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

If guided, is there information on the type and content of guidance and who initiates contact? Yes N/Ab Yes N/A Yes Yes Yes

Information on how often or how frequently the intervention should be used, possible prerequisites Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Qualification

Was the intervention developed by registered psychotherapists or specialists in the field of psychiatry, psychotherapy, or psychosomatic medicine or affected parties? Is their possible involvement clearly stated? Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Exclusion of participants with full-blown disorders (eg, severe depression and suicidal ideation) Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Effectiveness

Use of intention-to-treat analyses to estimate effects Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Between-group Cohen d is reported for primary outcome (determined in advance) Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Has the trial been registered in a clinical trial register? Yes No No No Yes Yes No
Safety of patients

Advice on handling of crises (eg, referring to professional care with face-to-face contact); if people with full-blown disorders are included: assessment of emergencies and immediate reference to professional help Yes Yes No No No Yes No

Provision of information on potential funding sources and their role in the conduction of the study Yes Yes Yes No Yes Yes No
Number of criteriac fulfilled (n=12), n (%) 12 (100) 5 (42) 9 (75) 7 (58) 10 (83) 12 (100) 8 (67)

aICD: International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems.

bN/A: not applicable.

cQuality criteria based on the study by Klein et al [1].