Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 4;12(12):1951. doi: 10.3390/genes12121951

Table 1.

Congenital erythrocytosis on NGS panel (N = 6).

Patient Age at Diagnosis Sex Hb (g/L), Hct (%), RBC (T/L) EV/PV Test EPO (mU/mL) Gene Accession-Nr. Variant dbSNP ID Zygosity Inheritance ACMG Classification
1 32 M 181, 54, 5.88 Absolute erythrocytosis 16.4 (normal) EPO NM_000799.4 c.*656G>A rs1186897562 het AD VUS (PM2, BP7)
2 34 M 195, 57, 5.89 Absolute erythrocytosis 8.45 (normal) EGLN1 NM_022051.2 c.1088T>G p.(Leu363Arg) N/A het AD Likely pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PP2, PP3)
3 80 M 207, 60, NA NA 7.6 (normal) EGLN1 NM_022051.3 c.122_124delACT, p.(Tyr41del) rs1182227189 het AD Likely pathogenic (PM1, PM2, PM4)
4 20 M 192, 56, 6.48 Absolute erythrocytosis 6.6 (normal) VHL NM_000551.4 c.340+648T>C rs73024533 het AR/AD VUS (PM2)
5 22 M 170, 48, 5.48 NA 11.09 (normal) EPAS1 NM_001430.5 c.466G>T, p.(Gly156Trp) rs377257704 het AD VUS (PM2, PP3)
JAK2 NM_004972.4 c.1711G>A, p.(Gly571Ser) rs139504737 het AD/somatic VUS (PM2, PP3, BS3)
6 27 M 174, 47, 5.54 Absolute erythrocytosis 6.06 (normal) JAK2 NM_004972.4 c.1169C>T, p.(Pro390Leu) rs768074072 het AD/somatic VUS (PM2, PP3)
SH2B3 NM_005475.3 c.107C>A, p.(Ala36Glu) rs574829930 het AD/somatic VUS (PM2)

Genes tested (N = 13): EPOR (exons 7, 8), VHL (orf including exon 1′), EGLN1, EPAS1, EPO (including several regulatory regions), JAK2 (exons 12–16), BPGM, HBB, HBA1, HBA2, HIF3A, OS9, SH2B3 somatic. Method: Ion AmpliSeq custom gene panel, sequencing on Thermo Fisher Ion Torrent S5. Interpretation: Only gene variants of the categories pathogenic, likely pathogenic and variant of unknown significance (VUS) according to ACMG guidelines 2015 are mentioned. Abbreviations: AR: autosomal recessive, AD: autosomal dominant; EPO: erythropoietin. EV/PV: erythrocyte volume to plasma volume, F: female, het: heterozygous, M: male, VUS: variant of unknown significance.