Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 23;100(51):e28425. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028425

Table 2.

Summary of the relationship between AGAP2-AS1 over-expressed and clinicopathological parameters.

Heterogeneity
Clinicopathological parameters Studies Patients OR (95% CI) P-value I 2 P-value Model
Age (older vs younger) 8 797 0.78 (0.59, 1.05) .10 46% .07 Fixed
Gender (male vs female) 7 750 1.08 (0.80, 1.46) .63 0% .75 Fixed
Tumor size (larger vs smaller) 7 748 2.28 (1.24, 4.18) .008 71% .002 Random
TNM stage (III + IV vs I + II) 7 747 3.73 (2.71, 5.13) <.00001 23% .25 Fixed
LNM (positive vs negative) 4 404 2.95 (1.96, 4.45) <.00001 12% .33 Fixed
DM (positive vs negative) 2 162 1.83 (0.38, 8.69) .45 71% .06 Random
Histological grade (well/moderately vs poorly) 4 283 0.49 (0.11, 2.25) .36 81% .001 Random

AGAP2-AS1 = ArfGAP with GTPase domain, ankyrin repeat and PH domain 2 antisense 1, CI = confidence interval, DM = distant metastasis, LNM = lymph node metastasis, OR = odds ratio.

Significance of bold values P <0.05.