Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 16;2021:8920757. doi: 10.1155/2021/8920757

Table 2.

Effect of PCB2 on SOD, MDA, and Ca2+ levels in PA-induced HepG2 cells

Groups SOD (U/mg) MDA (nmol/mg) Ca2+ (μmol/mg)
Control 2980.011±140.288 1.165±0.106 0.181±0.01
PA (125 μM) 2405.464±90.575## 1.521±0.032## 0.224±0.004###
PA + PCB2 (2.5 μM) 2953.916±105.401∗∗ 1.347±0.024 0.20±0.007∗∗
PA + PCB2 (5 μM) 3045.872±114.002∗∗ 1.321±0.022 0.196±0.009∗∗∗
PA + PCB2 (10 μM) 3323.062±158.858∗∗∗ 1.193±0.038∗∗ 0.19±0.008∗∗∗

HepG2 cells were exposed to PA (125 μM) and treated by PCB2 (2.5, 5, and 10 μM) for 24 h. SOD, MDA, and Ca2+ levels were detected by kits, respectively. The bold values are presented as means ± S.D.##P < 0.01 and###P < 0.001 vs control, P < 0.05, ∗∗P < 0.01, and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 vs model groups For SOD level, control vs. PA: P = 0.0066; PA vs. 2.5μM: P = 0.0089; PA vs. 5μM: P = 0.0031; PA vs. 10μM: P = 0.0002. For MDA level, control vs. PA: P = 0.0027; PA vs. 10μM: P = 0.0053. For Ca2+ level, control vs. PA: P<0.0001; PA vs. 2.5μM: P = 0.0014; PA vs. 5μM: P = 0.0003; PA vs. 10μM: P<0.0001. .