Skip to main content
. 2021 Mar 28;6(1):24730114211000637. doi: 10.1177/24730114211000637

Table 2.

General Characteristics of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses.

Characteristics No. (%) of Articles (n = 43)
Total (%) Abstract Without Spin Abstract With Spin P Value
Intervention type .45a
 Mixed 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Nonpharmacologic 10 (23.3) 2 (4.7) 8 (18.6)
 Pharmacologic 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Surgery 33 (76.7) 13 (30.2) 20 (46.5)
Article reports adherence to PRISMA .51b
 No 23 (53.5) 7 (16.3) 16 (37.2)
 Yes 20 (46.5) 8 (18.6) 12 (27.9)
Publishing journal recommends adherence to PRISMA .64b
 No 25 (58.1) 8 (18.6) 17 (39.5)
 Yes 18 (41.9) 7 (16.3) 11 (25.6)
Funding source .20a
 Not funded 18 (41.9) 4 (9.3) 14 (32.6)
 Private 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Combination of funding including industry 1 (2.3) 1 (2.3) 0 (0)
 Combination of funding not including industry 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Public 6 (14.0) 3 (7.0) 3 (7.0)
 Not mentioned 17 (39.5) 6 (14.0) 11 (25.6)
 Industry 1 (2.3) 1 (2.3) 0 (0)
AMSTAR-2 rating .79a
 High 0 (0) 0 (0) 0 (0)
 Moderate 14 (32.6) 6 (14.0) 8 (18.6)
 Low 14 (32.6) 4 (9.3) 10 (23.3)
 Critically low 15 (34.9) 5 (11.6) 10 (23.3)
Journal Impact Factor, M (SD) 4.09 (4.66) 3.95 (2.75) 4.18 (5.58) .88c (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.88-1.17)
Year study was received (1997-2020) .67c (OR: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.84-1.11)

Abbreviations: AMSTAR-2, A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews–2; CI, confidence interval; M, mean; OR, odds ratio; PRISMA, Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses.

a Fisher exact test.

b Pearson χ2.

c Logistic regression