Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 22;2(6Part A):651–664. doi: 10.1016/j.hroo.2021.09.004

Table 1.

A summary of the studies in the esophageal temperature monitoring probes

Study Year Type RCT Group 1 - type of LET probe Group 1, n Group 2 – control, n Ablation method Posterior settings Total in study, n Total in group 1 that had OGD, n Group 1 positive EDEL results, n (%) Group 2 positive EDEL results, n (%) Study outcomes Time of endoscopy (if known), days Adverse event from LET probe
Di Biase et al 2009 RCT but randomization for GA vs LA. All had LET monitoring probes 1 - GA vs LA ER400-9, Smiths Medical ASD Inc, Rockland, MA. Single-sensor probe. 50 NA RF 35 W; 20 seconds 50 50 13 (26%) NA GA increased risk of EDEL injury compared to LA 1 - capsule
Ahmed et al 2009 Prospective single-arm NA Vital Temp, Vital Signs Colorado Inc (Single thermocouple) 67 NA Cryo Cryo 67 35 6 (17.1%) NA Cryoballoon ablation can cause significant LET decreases, resulting in reversible esophageal ulcerations in 17% of patients 1
Di Biase et al 2010 Prospective single arm study NA ER400–9 Smiths Medical ASD, Inc, Rockland, MA 88 NA RF 35 W; 20 seconds 88 88 15 (17%) NA Capsule endoscopy can be used to detect EDELs 1
Sause et al 2010 Prospective single-arm NA Esotherm, FIAB, Florence, Italy (7F, 5 electrodes) 184 NA RF 30 W; 20 seconds 184 184 3 (1.63%) NA Temperature limit of 40 degrees was associated with lowest incidence of EDEL at the time the study was published 1
Halm et al 2010 Prospective single-arm NA Not specified 185 NA RF Not known 185 185 27 (14.6%) NA Localized esophageal ulcer-like lesion is a frequent event after left atrial catheter ablation and can be found in patients whose intraluminal temperature has reached at least 41 degrees Not known
Leite et al 2011 Prospective single-arm NA EPT Blazer II temperature ablation catheter, Boston Scientific, Natick, MA 45 NA RF 25 W; if LET increased by 2 degrees from baseline then stop ablation 45 45 0 NA A deflectable LET probe and stopping ablation after a 2-degree rise in LET may reduce esophageal injury 1–2
Contreras et al 2011 Prospective single-arm NA Acoustascope, Smiths Medical ASD, Inc, Keene, NH 219 NA RF 25 W; 20 seconds 219 82 22 (26.8%) NA The macroscopic severity of esophageal lesions detected on endoscopy the day after RF ablation can predict the time to resolution, with severe, deep ulcerations taking the longest to heal 1, 10, 14 days until healed
Furnkranz et al 2013 Prospective single-arm NA Sensitherm, St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, MN (3 thermocouples) 32 NA Cryo Cryo 32 32 6 (18.75%) NA Second-generation 28 mm CB PVI is associated with significant esophageal cooling, resulting in lesion formation in 19% of the patients. LET measurement accurately predicts lesion formation. 1–3
Knopp et al 2014 Prospective single-arm NA Sensitherm, St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, MN 425 NA RF 30 W 425 425 47 (11%) NA Thermal injury including gastroparesis was common after AF ablation 1–3
Furnkranz et al 2014 Prospective single-arm NA Sensitherm, St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, MN 94 NA Cryo Cryo 94 32 6 (18.8%) NA Titration of CB PVI depending on LET temp fall to -15 degrees can reduce EDEL Within 3 days
Metzner et al 2014 Prospective single-arm NA Sensitherm, St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, MN 50 NA Cryo Cryo 50 50 6 (12%) NA Using the second-generation 28-mm CB, EDEL was detected in 6 of 50 (12%) patients. All mucosal lesions were in the healing process on repeat EGD. 2
Muller P et al 2015 Prospective double-arm – observational - nonrandomized NA Sensitherm, FIAB, Firenze, Italy (7F, 5 electrodes) 40 40 RF 25 W 80 40 12 (30%) 1 (2.5%) Use of temperature probes the only independent predictor of development of EDEL: Use of temperature probes was a risk factor for EDEL during AF ablation in this study 2
Halbfass et al 2017 Observational NA S-Cath TM (Circa Scientific, LLC, Englewood, CO); esophageal temperature probe with insulated thermocouples: s-shaped and 12 electrodes 40 40 RF 25 W 80 40 3 (7.5%) 4 (10%) No reduction in EDELs with use of LET 1–4
Deneke et al 2018 Prospective single-arm NA IRTS, Securus Medical Group, Inc, Cleveland, OH; 9F esophageal catheter connected to an external infrared detector 63 NA RF 25 W; 20 seconds; 5–20 g of contact force 63 63 12 (19%) NA Peak temperature rise was associated with EDELs 1
Daly et al 2018 Prospective single-arm NA IRTS, Securus Medical Group, Inc, Cleveland, OH 16 NA RF 20 W 16 16 12.5 (78.1%) NA Infrared thermography provided dynamic, high-resolution mapping of esophageal temperatures during cardiac ablation. Esophageal thermal injury occurred with temperatures >50°C and was associated with large spatiotemporal gradients. 1–2
Schoene et al 2020 RCT 1 Sensitherm, St Jude Medical, Inc, St Paul, MN 90 90 RF 25–30 W 180 90 10 (11.1%) 8 (8.9%) The Sensitherm LET probe does not affect the probability of developing EDEL Within 3 days
Chen S et al 2020 Prospective single-arm NA S-Cath TM (Circa Scientific, LLC, Englewood, CO) 122 NA RF - AI-HP 50 W/400 AI 122 57 2 (3.5%) NA AI-HP ablation is associated with low incidence of EDELs; esophageal temperature probe monitoring was in use in these cases 1
Meininghaus et al 2021 RCT 1 S-Cath TM (Circa Scientific, LLC, Englewood, CO) 44 42 RF 25 W 86 44 6 (13.6%) 2 (4.8%) LET monitoring does not prevent EDELs; temperatures >42 degrees were associated with increased likelihood of mucosal lesions Within 3 days 4 cases of epistaxis

AF = atrial fibrillation; AI-HP = ablation index-high power; CB = cryoballoon; Cryo = cryoablation; EDEL = endoscopically detected esophageal lesion; EGD = esophago-gastroduodenoscopy; GA = general anaesthesia; LA = local anaesthesia; LET = luminal esophageal temperature; NA = not available; OGD = osophago-gastroduodenoscopy; PVI = pulmonary vein isolation; RCT = randomized controlled trial; RF = radiofrequency.