Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 16;18(24):13258. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413258

Table 3.

Effects of training on the circulating concentrations of IL-10 in sedentary adults with overweight or obesity.

Study Subjects Experimental Conditions Training Protocol Pre- vs. Post-Training Differences
Fat Mass (%) IL-10 (pg/mL)
Leggate et al. 2012 Men (23.7 ± 5.2 yr) (n = 12) EC1: HIIT (29.1 ± 3.1 kg/m2; n = 12) 2 weeks
3 days/week
HIIT 10 × (4 min 85% VO2peak + NR R)
NR EC1: 2.1 ± 0.6 vs. 1.9 ± 0.6
Auerbach et al. 2013 Men (20 to 40 yr) (n = 48) EC1: ET (28.1 ± 1.3 kg/m2; n = 12)
EC2: Control (28.1 ± 1.3 kg/m2; n = 12)
12 weeks
7 days/week
65–85% HRR (600 kcal)
EC1: 31.3 ± 4.1 vs. 29.4 ± 3.8 *
EC2: 31.3 ± 4.1 vs. 31.1 ± 3.5
EC1: 11 ± 11 vs. 9.5 ± 8.5
EC2: 11 ± 11 vs. 15.5 ± 16.2
Nikseresht et al. 2014 Men (34 to 46 yr) (n = 32) EC1: HIIT (NR; n = 12)
EC2: RT (NR; n = 12)
EC3: Control (NR; n = 10)
12 weeks
3 days/week
45–60 min/session
EC1: 4 × (4 min 80–90% HRmax + 3 min 55–65% HRmax)
EC2: 1–4 s/2–20 rep 40–95% RM (R = 1–7 min)
EC1: ~30.4 vs. ~27.9 *,#
EC2: ~30.0 vs. ~27.4 *,#
EC3: ~29.5 vs. ~30.1
EC1: 6.68 ± 0.82 vs. 7.32 ± 0.99 *
EC2: 7.06 ± 0.71 vs. 7.46 ± 0.64 *
EC3: 7.31 ± 1.06 vs. 7.17 ± 0.81
Brunelli et al. 2015 Men (48.7 ± 1.0 yr) (n = 30) EC1: Concurrent training (31.0 ± 0.4 kg/m2; n = 17)
EC2: Control (31.0 ± 0.4 kg/m2; n = 13)
24 weeks
3 days/week
6 exercise (3 × 6−10 rep RM (R = 1 min)) + 30 min running 50–85% VO2peak
EC1: 36.0 ± 1.4 vs. 28.6 ± 1.6 * EC2: 32.3 ± 1.7 vs. 31.1 ± 1.8 EC1: ~0.22 ± 0.01 vs. ~0.32 ± 0.02
EC2: ~0.38 ± 0.04 vs. ~0.22 ± 0.02
Nikseresht et al. 2018 Men (~39.5 yr) (n = 22) EC1: RT (n = 12)
EC2: Control (n = 10)
12 weeks
3 days/week
10 exercise (1 × 20 at 40 to 90%1 RM)
EC1: 30.7 ± 1.8 vs. 28.4 ± 1.9 *,# EC2: 29.7 ± 1.2 vs. 30.1 ± 1.7 EC1: 7.06 ± 0.71 vs. 7.58 ± 0.67 *
EC2: 7.46 ± 0.64 vs. 7.17 ± 0.81

EC = experimental condition; ET = Endurance training; HIIT = high intensity interval training; HRR = heart rate reserve; HRmax = maximal heart rate; NR = non-reported; R = rest between series; RM = maximal repetition; VO2peak = peak oxygen uptake; ~ = estimated data; * p < 0.05 within group comparison; # p < 0.05 between group comparison. Data are shown as mean ± SD.