Table 3.

Evaluation of the intervention with patients and healthcare professionals.

Patients (n = 4)		Healthcare Professionals (n = 17)
Grade for intervention # mean ± stdev	7.75 ± 0.957	Grade for intervention # mean ± stdev	7.97 ± 0.910
Usability of the intervention (n) ⋅Complicated ⋅Neutral ⋅Easy	0 1 3	Fit to daily practice (n) Yes Partly No	17 0 0
Complexity of the content (n) ⋅Complicated ⋅Just right ⋅Easy	0 3 1	Complexity of workshop (n) Complicated Just right Easy	0 12 5
Length (n) ⋅Too long ⋅Good ⋅Too short	2 2 0	Length (n) Too long Good Too short	0 10 7
Self-reported effect (n) on: CKD understanding Understanding of consequences Understanding of lifestyle Lifestyle confidence Knowledge on consultation topics Consultation self-efficacy	4 3 1 1 3 2	Improved knowledge * mean ± stdev	5.94 ± 0.854
Usefulness other patients ˆ mean ± stdev	4.00 ± 0.000	Improved self-efficacy * mean ± stdev	5.75 ± 1.000
Usefullness significant others ˆ mean ± stdev	3.75 ± 0.500	Expected strategy use * mean ± stdev	6.13 ± 0.619

n = number of participants, stdev = standard deviation. ^# Rated between 1–10, as in the Dutch grading system; * Measured with 7-point Likert scales with statements. Answer options ranged from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Maximum possible score = 7. ˆ Measured with 5-point Likert scales with statements. Answer options ranged from strongly disagree to strongly agree. Maximum possible score = 5.