Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 11;21(24):8297. doi: 10.3390/s21248297

Table 1.

Descriptive statistics of the participants‘ evaluation of the three sensor-based lifelogging technologies.

Construct Operationalization Sensor-Based Technology
Overall PIR H&T MAG
Min Max M SD M SD M SD
Perception of
Benefits
Recognizing deviations from normal behavior
(e.g., leaving but not returning; wandering at night) **
1 6 4.3 1.3 4.0 1.4 4.3 1.4
Triggering alarms (e.g., when objects are not closed
properly, in emergency situations) **
1 6 4.2 1.4 4.4 1.4 4.5 1.3
Automatic reminders (e.g., to ventilate, close doors) ** 1 6 3.8 1.5 4.2 1.4 4.2 1.4
Increased security (e.g., forgotten pot on the stove) ** 1 6 4.3 1.4 4.8 1.2 4.2 1.5
Recognition of changes in movement
(e.g., due to medication intake) **
1 6 4.2 1.2 3.9 1.4 4.1 1.3
Recognition of emergency situations
(e.g., being not able to stand up) **
1 6 4.7 1.1 4.4 1.4 4.4 1.4
Recognition of emergencies (e.g., falls) ** 1 6 4.7 1.2 4.4 1.5 4.4 1.4
Perception of
Barriers
Feeling of dependence 1 6 3.4 1.4 3.4 1.4 3.4 1.4
Perceived violation of own privacy ** 1 6 3.9 1.5 3.7 1.5 3.7 1.6
Need for a permanent receiver (=collector) 1 6 3.6 1.3 3.6 1.4 3.5 1.4
Perceived harmfulness of signals to health 1 6 3.1 1.4 3.0 1.4 2.9 1.4
Doubts about reliability 1 6 3.7 1.3 3.6 1.3 3.6 1.3
Unintentionally triggered alarms 1 6 3.9 1.3 3.8 1.3 3.9 1.4
Unintentional damage/defects of the sensor
(e.g., by dropping).
1 6 3.5 1.3 3.5 1.3 3.5 1.3
Fears of emissions (e.g., noise, light, radio) 1 6 3.2 1.4 3.2 1.4 3.1 1.4
Feeling of surveillance ** 1 6 4.0 1.2 3.8 1.5 4.0 1.6
Acceptance of
Assistive Technology
I find the use of such sensors useful. * 1 6 4.2 1.2 4.3 1.2 4.3 1.2
I would like to use such sensors in my home. ** 1 6 3.3 1.4 3.5 1.4 3.5 1.4
I can well imagine the use of the sensors. ** 1 6 3.7 1.4 4.0 1.4 4.0 1.4