Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 8;19(12):697. doi: 10.3390/md19120697

Table 2.

Chitosan-based delivery systems and scaffolds in in vivo wound healing and skin damage models intended for localized antimicrobial therapy.

Delivery
System/Scaffold
System Microorganisms Findings Ref.
MW
DDA
Particles and carriers CNPs:
Chitosan
50–190 KDa
DDA: 75–85%
Antimicrobial peptide LL-37
MRSA MRSA-infected wound model in mice:
No growth of MRSA was observed in the group treated with LL-37 loaded CNPs after 7 days. This antibacterial effect was superior to all other treatment conditions.
[64]
CNPs:
Chitosan
50–190 kDa
DDA: n.a.
Cefadroxil
S. aureus S. aureus-infected wound model in rats:
CNPs loaded with cefadroxil embedded in in situ poloxamer 407 hydrogel showed a significant reduction in the bacterial burden in the wounds and complete healing after 5 days.
[184]
CNPs:
Chitosan
LMW
DDA: 75–85%
Vancomycin hydrochloride
MRSA MRSA-infected wound model in mice:
the rats treated with pH-responsive CNPs comprising gemini surfactants loaded with vancomycin displayed a significantly reduced bacterial burden compared with both drug-free CNPs and free vancomycin.
[185]
Excipient and coatings Beads:
Chitosan
MW: n.a.
DDA: 90%
Zinc oxide NPs
Noninfected wound model in mice:
The bacterial growth in the wound without induced infections treated with any of the chitosan/PVA/zinc beads was lower than the control. Almost no growth was observed in mice treated with chitosan, chitosan/PVA, or the loaded beads.
[176]
Chitosan-functionalized graphene quantum dots:
Chitosan oligosaccharide
MW: n.a.
DDA: n.a.
Graphene quantum dots
S. aureus S. aureus-infected wound model in rats:
the rats treated with the chitosan-functionalized quantum dots composite together with illumination exhibited improved wound healing compared to all the other groups.
[186]
Polymer-based gels Hydrogel:
Chitosan
LMW
DDA: >85%
Terbinafine hydrochloride
C. albicans C. albicans-infected wound in rats:
chitosan hydrogel loaded with vesicles comprising penetration enhancers produced a significant reduction of C. albicans in the wound bed.
[187]
Hydrogel:
Cyclodextrin-modified chitosan 15–22 kDa
DDA: 75−80%
Diclofenac
Silver ions
P. aeruginosa P. aeruginosa-infected wound in a murine model:
β-cyclodextrin modified chitosan supramolecular hydrogel loaded with diclofenac and silver ions displayed improved wound healing and reduced the bacterial load in the wound bed.
[188]
Hydrogel:
Chitosan
MW: n.a.
DDA: ≥95%
Silver nitrate
Calcium sulfate dehydrate
Zinc nitrate hexahydrate
Copper nitrate trihydrate
S. aureus S. aureus-infected wound model in mice: The chitosan/ion hydrogel in gauzes surpassed chitosan alone and the control group in wound healing. Additionally, the group treated with the chitosan/ion hydrogel in gauzes significantly reduced bacterial load in the wound bed compared with chitosan alone. [189]
Hydrogel:
Chitosan
300–450 kDa
DDA: 85–95%
Silver sulfadiazine
S. aureus S. aureus-infected burn and wound model in mice:
The healing rate of the wounds treated with the silver sulfadiazine nanocrystal in the hydrogel was faster, and the overall healing was superior to a cream formulation in both the burn and wound model.
[190]
Hydrogel:
Chitosan
MW: 100−150 kDa
DDA: 85%
Ciprofloxacin
Fluconazole
S. aureus
E. coli
C. albicans
Polymicrobial wound model in rats:
The ciprofloxacin and fluconazole-loaded fibrin NPs loaded in chitosan hydrogel bandage displayed a significant reduction in microbial load in the infected wound compared to the unloaded- fibrin NPs loaded in chitosan. However, there was still some microbial growth after 14 days.
[191]
Hydrogel:
Chitosan
(maleic anhydride grafted chitosan)
MW: n.a.
DDA: n.a.
Antimicrobial peptide
Hydrogen peroxide
MRSA MRSA biofilm-infected wound model in mice:
The hydrogel loaded with antimicrobial peptide and hydrogen peroxide displayed a significant reduction in bacterial viability compared to all other treatments; however, not complete eradication. Chitosan alone reduced bacterial viability.
Wound closure also improved in the groups treated with the coloaded hydrogel.
[192]
Scaffolds Film:
Chitosan
50–190 kDa
DDA: 75–85%
S-nitrosoglutathione
MRSA MRSA biofilm-infected wound model in mice:
Both loaded and unloaded chitosan films reduced the bacterial burden in the wound and improved the healing rate compared to the control group. However, the NO-releasing film displayed a significantly improved healing and dispersal of the biofilm.
[193]
Film:
Chitosan
200 kDa
DDA: 85%
Catechol
MRSA MRSA-infected wound model in rats:
The bacterial load in the group treated with the catechol-chitosan film at a reduced state was significantly reduced compared with the other groups. Additionally, the tissue in this group appeared normal.
[194]
Film:
Chlorinated chitosan
MMW
DDA: 75–85%
Chloramine
MRSA MRSA-infected wound model in mice:
Chlorinated chitosan film produced with electrofabrication induced faster wound healing and reduced the wound’s bacterial burden, compared to the control and plain chitosan.
[195]
Membrane:
Chitosan
MW: n.a.
DDA: 87%
Silver sulfadiazine
P. aeruginosa,
S. aureus
S. aureus and P. aeruginosa infected-wound model in rats:
The membranes significantly reduced the bacterial load in the wounds compared to the control group with a rapid initial eradication.
[196]
Dressing:
Chitosan
190–310 kDa
DDA: 75–85%
Silver NPs
P. aeruginosa P. aeruginosa-infected wound model in mice:
The mice treated with the polyelectrolyte complex had a reduced bacterial load in the tissue after 14 days of treatment and higher survival than mice treated with gauze.
[197]
Nanofibers:
Chitosan
≈250 kDa
DDA: n.a.
Indocyanine green
MRSA MRSA-infected wound model in rats:
The indocyanine green-loaded chitosan/PVA nanofibers and illumination demonstrated improved wound healing and reduced bacterial burden in the wound bed compared to all other treatment groups.
[198]
Dressing loaded with microspheres:
Chitosan
MMW
DDA: ≥85%
Gentamycin sulfate
S. aureus
E. coli
S. aureus and E. coli-infected wound model in rats:
The group treated with gelatin microspheres loaded with gentamycin and platelet-rich plasma on chitosan dressing displayed reduced bacterial load and a faster wound healing rate than the group treated with gauze.
[199]
Dressing:
Chitosan
MMW
DDA: 97%
Graphene oxide
Copper NPs
S. aureus S. aureus-infected wound model in mice:
The group treated with the graphene oxide–copper composite in chitosan/hyaluronic acid hydrogel improved wound healing compared with all other groups.
[200]
Sponge:
Chitosan
10–30 kDa
DDA: ≥95%
Silver NPs
S. aureus S. aureus-infected wound model in rabbits:
the group treated with the silver NP-sponge healed faster than the control group, and although not statistically significant, faster than the marketed silver dressing.
[201]
Sponge:
Chitosan
MW: 500 kDa
DDA: 90%
Quaternary ammonium CNPs
S. aureus S. aureus-infected wound model in mice:
the chitosan sponges loaded with quaternary ammonium CNPs exhibited superior antimicrobial activity compared to sponges without CNPs and untreated mice on days 7 and 10.
[202]

n.a.: not applicable/not denoted; CNP: chitosan nanoparticles, DDA: degree of deacetylation, LMW: low molecular weight, MMW: medium molecular weight, MRSA: methicillin-resistant S. aureus, MW: molecular weight, PVA: poly(vinyl alcohol).