Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 7;7(12):1046. doi: 10.3390/jof7121046

Table 3.

The performance of BDG assays in recent studies on pneumocystosis in patients with haematological malignancies (HM).

Study Patients Comparison Cut-Off, pg/mL Sensitivity %
(95% CI)
Specificity %
(95% CI)
PPV (95% CI) NPV (95% CI)
Engsbro et al., 2019 [47] N = 45, HIV, SOT, HSCT, HM, solid cancer BDG compared to immunofluorescence microscopy
All patients 60 89 (52–100) 48 (23–72)
80 89 (52–100) 65 (38–86)
PCR-positive patients 60 100 (16–100) 71 (29–96)
80 100 (16–100) 74 (54–89)
BDG compared to clinical categorization
All patients 60 89 (65–99) 64 (42–81)
80 83 (59–96) 74 (54–89)
PCR-positive patients 60 87 (59–98) 100 (16–100)
80 80 (52–96) 100 (16–100)
Morjaria et al., 2019 [42] N = 53 HM, HSCT, solid cancer BDG performance vs. PCR in PCR-positive cases
Definite/Probable PJP 80 87% 84.6% 94.6 68.8
Definite/Probable PJP 200 70% 100% 100 52
Szvalb et al., 2020 [56] N = 101 HM, Solid cancer BDG performance in PCR-positive cases
80 53.5 (43.8–62.9) 78.4 (67.7–86.2) 7.8 (4.4–11.2) 98.0 (97.6–98.5)
200 41.6 (32.5–51.3) 87.8 (78.5–93.5) 10.4 (4.3–16.5) 97.8 (97.4–98.2)
400 35.6 (27.0–45.4) 93.2 (85.1–97.1) 15.2 (3.8–26.5) 97.7 (97.3–98.1)
Damiani et al., 2021 [53] N = 39 Systemic autoimmune or inflammatory disorder, SOT, HM, solid cancer Proven PJP, defined as a positive microscopic detection of P. jirovecii in BAL
All patients 80 87 (73–94) 97 (87–99) 97 (85–99) 88 (75–95)
Only HM population 80 64 (35–85) 100 (74–100) 100 (64–100) 73 (48–89)

BDG, serum (1,3)-beta-D glucan; CI, Confidence Interval; HIV, Human Immunodeficiency Virus; SOT, Solid Organ Transplant; HSCT, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, HM, Hematologic Malignancy.