Table 1.
Study/ Number of Data |
Algorithms Applied |
Objectives | Outcome Presentation |
---|---|---|---|
Liansheng W. [93] 707 spinal AP X-ray images |
U-net | Top eight methods from twelve teams (including intuition, workflow, and implementation). Experimental results show that, overall, the best performing method achieved an asymmetric mean absolute percentage (SMAPE) of 21.7%. | Quantitative measurement of the spine. |
Liyan L. [116] 895 axial spine MRI images from 143 patients |
OSBP-Net, IPDC, and IICR |
Applied to the output of the SFEs, taking into account that the activated regions in the feature maps of two paths should be theoretically different. | The prediction results, comparison with many other CADq models |
Shen Z. [123] 450 MRI scans |
Can-See is a two-step detection framework:
|
Category-consistent self-calibration recognition system (Can-See) used to accurately classify the labels and precisely predict the bounding boxes of all vertebrae with improved discriminative capabilities for vertebrae categories and self-awareness of false-positive detections. | Can-See achieves high performance (testing accuracy reaches 0.955) and outperforms other state-of-the-art methods. |
Zhongyi H. [113] 253 clinical patients |
Neural-symbolic learning (NSL) framework |
Compares the semantic segmentation ability of a neural symbolic learning framework (NSL) with several state-of-the-art semantic segmentation networks (FCN, SegNet, DeepLabV3+, U-Net, Spine-GAN, GN-SGR, AGN-SGR, and AGN-DN). |
NSL can directly generate radiologist-level diagnosis reports (using two steps) in spine radiology. |
Dong Z. [118] 240 subjects |
Sequential conditional reinforcement learning (SCRL). SCRL coordinates three major components (AMRL, Y-Net and FC-ResNet) |
Propose a sequential conditional reinforcement learning network (SCRL) to tackle the simultaneous detection and segmentation of VBs from MR spine images. | SCRL achieves accurate detection and segmentation results, where on average, the detection IoU is 92.3%, segmentation dice is 92.6%, and classification mean accuracy is 96.4%. |
Yanfei H. [117] 200 subjects |
MMCL-Net:
|
Novel end-to-end multi-task multi-structure correlation learning network (MMCL-Net) for the detection, segmentation and classification (normal, slight, marked and severe) of three types of spine structure: disc, vertebra and neural foramen simultaneously | MMCL-Net achieves high performance with a mAP of 0.9187, a classification accuracy of 90.67%, and a dice coefficient of 90.60%. |
Liyan L. [116] 895 axial spine MRI images from 143 subjects |
Dense enhancing network (DE-Net) |
Dense enhancing network (DE-Net), which uses the dense enhancing blocks (DEBs) as its main body. | All deep learning models obtain very small prediction errors, and the proposed DE-Net with CSDPR acquires the smallest error among all methods. |
Ranran Z. [115] 407 subjects |
Multi-task relational learning network (MRLN) | A dilation convolution group is used to expand the receptive field, and LSTM (long short-term memory) to learn the prior knowledge of the order relationship between the vertebral bodies. | The accurate segmentation, localization and identification of vertebrae. |
Jiawei H. [112] 320 axial lumbar MRIs |
BS-ESNet | For the first time:
|
Proposal an explicit saliency-aware learning framework for segmentation of paraspinal muscles at varied spine levels. |
Heyou Ch. [114] 292 MRI scans |
A spatial graph convolutional network (GCN) | The proposed method is trained in an end-to-end. | Method achieves high performance (89.28 ± 5.21) of IDR and (85.37 ± 4.09%) of mIoU) from arbitrary input images. |
Shen Z. [124] none |
Adversarial recognition (FAR) network | Network to accurately perform spondylolisthesis grading by excellently detecting critical vertebrae without the need for locating landmarks. | Training accuracy: 0.9883 ± 0.0094, testing accuracy: 0.8933 ± 0.0276 for MRI images of different modalities, which can be attributed to the excellent critical vertebrae detection (detection mAP75 for training: 1 ± 0, for testing: 0.9636 ± 0.0180, and IoU (intersection-over-union) ≥ 0.9/0.8 for most detections with their corresponding ground truth in the training/testing dataset). |
Liansheng W. [88] 526 X-rays |
MVE-Net | Proposed multi-view extrapolation net (MVE-Net) that provides accurate automated scoliosis estimation in multi-view (both AP and LAT) X-rays. | Experimental results on 526 X-rays show 7.81 and 6.26 circular mean absolute error in AP and LAT angle estimation, which shows the MVE-Net provides an accurate Cobb angle estimation in multi-view X-rays |
Shen Z. [123] none |
Faster adversarial recognition (FAR) | Proposed faster adversarial recognition (FAR) network to accurately perform spondylolisthesis grading by excellently detecting critical vertebrae without the need for locating landmarks. | training accuracy: 0.9883 ± 0.0094, testing accuracy: 0.8933 ± 0.0276 for MRI images of different modalities, which can be attributed to the excellent critical vertebrae detection (detection mAP75 for training: 1 ± 0, for testing: 0.9636 ± 0.0180, and IoU (intersection-over-union) ≥ 0.9/0.8 for most detections with their corresponding ground truth in the training/testing dataset). |
Shumao P. [111] MR images of 215 subjects |
Cascade amplifier regression network (CARN) | Proposed novel cascade amplifier regression network (CARN) with manifold regularization including local structure-preserved manifold regularization (LSPMR) and adaptive local shape-constrained manifold regularization (ALSCMR) to achieve accurate direct automated multiple indices estimation. | Proposed approach achieves impressive performance with mean absolute errors of 1.22±1.04 mm and 1.24 ± 1.07 mm for the estimation of 30 lumbar spinal indices of the T1-weighted and T2-weighted spinal MR images, respectively. |