Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 25;13(12):2361. doi: 10.3390/v13122361

Table 4.

Validation parameters of the saliva and OPS tests compared with NPS (gold standard method).

Sample Type 1 qPCR Positiven
(%)
Agreement
(%)
Sensitivity
(95% CI)
Specificity
(95% CI)
PPV
(95% CI)
NPV
(95% CI)
Kappa AUC
(95% CI)
LR
OPS 220 (15.3) 96.12 81.5
(0.80–0.89)
99.2%
(0.98–0.99)
94%
(0.90–0.97)
97%
(0.96–0.97)
0.85 0.69
(0.68–0.78)
85.68
Saliva 225 (15.6) 92.70 73.3
(0.67–0.78)
96.9%
(0.95–0.97)
83%
(0.78–0.88)
94%
(0.92–0.95)
0.74 0.73
(0.66–0.75)
23.38
Saliva with VTM 193 (13.4) 92.28 66.1
(0.60–0.72)
98%
(0.97–0.98)
88%
(0.82–0.92)
92.9%
(0.91–0.94)
0.71 0.73
(0.68–0.78)
33.6

1 Number of paired samples was 1440. OPS: oropharyngeal swab; Saliva with VTM: saliva with viral transport medium; qPCR: quantitative PCR; PPV: positive predictive value; NPV: negative predictive value; AUC: area under the curve; LR: likelihood rate; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval.