Table 1.
Comparisons of water quality monitoring systems for aquaculture.
| No. | Sensors | Processor | Communication | Information Platform | References | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T | pH | DO | EC | TD | ORP | Sal | |||||
| 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | * | PICNIC 2.0 | CDMA | Intranet Platform |
Zhua et al. (2010) |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Multimeter | × | × | Zhang et al. (2011) |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Wastmode | ZeeBee/WiFi/GPRS | DiGi International | Odey & Li (2013) |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ATMega | ZeeBee | LabVIEW | Simbeye & Yang (2018) |
| 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | Dataloger | Manual offload | HOBO | Schmidt et al. (2019) |
| 6 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | Raspberry Pi | WiFi/CDMA | ThingSpeak | Saparudin et al. (2019) |
| 7 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | Embeded MCU | RoLa/WiFi | ThingSpeak | Dahn et al. (2020) |
| 8 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ESP-32 | WiFi | ThingSpeak | Proposed |