Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 25;13(12):4239. doi: 10.3390/nu13124239

Table 2.

Nutritional status of robust, physical frailty MCI, and cognitive frailty in the elderly.

Nutritional Status Total
(n = 373)
Robust a
(n = 48)
Physical Frailty b
(n = 13)
MCI c
(n = 177)
Cognitive Frailty d
(n = 135)
p-Value
MNA-SF, n (%)
At risk of malnutrition
Malnourished

221 (59.2)
31 (8.3)

30 (62.5)
2 (4.2)

6 (46.2)
3 (23.1)

106 (59.9)
8 (4.5)

79 (58.5)
18 (13.3)
0.04 *
MNA-SF score, mean ± SD 10.41 ± 1.84 10.79 ± 1.51 9.69 + 2.18 10.68 + 1.62 10.02 + 2.10 <0.01 *,ab,ad,bc,cd
Triceps skinfold thickness (cm), mean ± SD 18.17 ± 8.79 19.41 ± 8.14 22.86 ± 15.97 17.25 ± 7.17 18.49 + 9.84 0.08
Low calf circumference, n (%) 194 (52) 17 (35.4) 6 (46.2) 96 (54.2) 75 (55.6) 0.09
Calf circumference (cm), mean ± SD 33.09 ± 4.55 34.20 ± 2.95 33.47 ± 3.55 33.32 ± 5.53 32.36 ± 3.48 0.08
Underweight by BMI, n (%) 42 (11.3) 3 (6.3) 1 (7.7) 20 (11.3) 18 (13.3) 0.58

MCI, Mild cognitive impairment; MNA-SA, Mini Nutritional Assessment Short-Form; SD, Standard deviation; All p-values of the categorical variables were obtained from Chi-square test, for the parametric continuous variables, p-values were obtained from one-way ANOVA, for the non-parametric continuous variables, p-values were obtained Kruskal-Wallis test; * Statistically significant for p ≤ 0.05; The comparison groups were denoted as following a Robust, b Physical Frailty, c MCI, and d Cognitive Frailty; Statistically significant (p ≤ 0.05) for post-hoc pairwise comparison was denoted as following, ab Robust and Physical frailty, ac Robust and MCI, bd Physical frailty and Cognitive frailty, cd MCI and Cognitive frailty.