Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Jan 1.
Published in final edited form as: Methods. 2021 Jun 25;197:63–73. doi: 10.1016/j.ymeth.2021.06.014

Table 2.

Selection criteria for P-TIRF traces with rationales

Criterion Rationale
Clear anti-correlation in donor and acceptor signal when FRET states switch In genuine FRET, only one signal is active at a time
Acceptor signal is present Filters out traces with a bleached acceptor or no QP.
No multistep transitions It is hard to distinguish genuine FRET transitions from noise in such traces
No signal drifting into the baseline Worsening S/N renders some FRET states indistinguishable from noise
Very low high-FRET or very high low-FRET values and very weak S/N These traces are susceptible to incorrect FRET assignments in HMM modeling
Only the longest segment or the one with the best S/N is chosen Prevents data bias by a few traces with a large number of transitions
Low-FRET last events in segment accepted only if acceptor is present after that event. Prevents acceptor photobleaching from tainting kinetic data
Traces must have distinction between signal and baseline A static signal and an unusually intense baseline cannot be distinguished