Table 2.
Study | Aim(s) | Design | Sample | Condition and target area of rehabilitation | Method of data collection and analysis |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Ates et al., 2014 [58]; Three EU countries (unspecified) | To report on the technical challenges presented by the use of SPO and the feedback from therapists and patients | Technical & performance evaluation |
24 patients; 33–81 years; 11 m and 9 f No information about the therapists |
Stroke; hand impairment | Clinical observation and descriptive summary into themes |
Beveridge et al., 2015 [34]; Canada | To explore the experiences and perspectives of parents whose young, ambulatory children with CP were undergoing Lokomat gait training, and consider how parents' values about walking influenced therapy decisions for their children | Qualitative descriptive design | 5 mothers and 1 fathers of 5 (4 m and 1 f) children; children aged 5–11 years; 2 parents were Anglo-Canadian and the others from Asian backgrounds | Cerebral palsy; walking rehabilitation | Individual, semi-structured, face-to-face interviews; followed the Dierckx de Casterle approach to analysis of qualitative data: the Qualitative Analysis Guide of Leuven (QUAGOL) |
Bezmez and Yardimci, 2016 [54]; Turkey | To explore the role of a robotic gait training device (Lokomat) and its role in rehabilitation in Turkey | Ethnographic study | 42 participants; 7 doctors, 2 nurses, 2 physiotherapists, 2 non-medical personnel, 20 in-patients, and 9 former patients | Traumatic injury or illnesses; bodily disability and inability to walk | Individual, semi-structured interviews; no information provided on the method of analysis |
Cahill et al., 2018 [25]; Ireland | To gain an understanding of the experience of using a RWD within a gym-based setting from the perspective of non-ambulatory individuals with SCI | Qualitative methodology | 4 males and 1 female; mean age 40.75 | Spinal cord injury; walking rehabilitation | In-depth semi-structured interviews; thematic analysis |
Danzl et al., 2013 [41]; USA | To investigate the feasibility of combining tDCS to the LE motor cortex with novel locomotor training to facilitate gait in subjects with chronic stroke and low ambulatory status; and to obtain insight from participants and their carers to inform future trial design | Mixed methods: a double-blind, sham-controlled, randomized quantitative design and an exploratory descriptive qualitative design | Final sample 8 patients; 4 males and 4 females; mean age of 67.8 years (range, 44–80 years) | Stroke; lower limb (gait) rehabilitation | Semi-structured interviews; inductive thematic analysis |
Eicher et al., 2019 [27]; Germany | To identify differences regarding usability, acceptability, and barriers of usage of a robot-supported gait rehabilitation system between a younger and older group of patients with gait impairments | Pilot/feasibility study assessing system usability of a robot-supported gait rehabilitation system between a younger and older group of patients with gait impairments | 13 completed all sessions; 7 were older patients (group G: 75 mean age, range 69–84), 6 were younger patients (group Y: 36 mean age, range 20–55); 11 male and 2 females | Stroke/brain haemorrhage, hemiplegia, other (e.g., accidents, falls, not specified); gait rehabilitation | Structured interviews; qualitative content analysis by Mayring (2010) |
Elnady et al., 2018 [35]; Canada | To describe users’ perceptions about existing wearable robotic devices for the upper extremity; identify if there is a need to develop new devices for the upper extremity and the desired features; and to explore obstacles that would influence the utilization of these new devices | Exploratory focus group discussions |
Group 1: 8 people with stroke (1 f and 7 m); Group 2: 8 therapists: 4 Physiotherapists, 2 Occupational therapists; 2 Rehabilitation assistants (8 f) |
Stroke; upper limb rehabilitation | Focus groups; thematic analysis |
Flynn et al., 2019 [53]; Australia | To explore occupational therapists’ and physiotherapists’ perceptions of robotic therapy for the upper limb and the perceived barriers and enablers influencing implementation | Qualitative methodology involving two discipline-specific focus groups | 12 participants: 6 occupational therapists (mean age = 29 years, range = 24–39) and 6 physiotherapists (mean age = 30, range = 23–51); 9 female and 3 males | Stroke; upper limb movement at the shoulder, elbow and hand (with the wrist fixed in neutral or pronation) | Focus groups; data were deductively analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) |
Gilbert et al., 2018 [46]; UK | To determine whether or not the MUJO System was acceptable to patients with shoulder dysfunction and their rehabilitation professionals | Qualitative study | 10 patients (median age was 38.5 years, range = 19–54; 5 f and 5 m) and 7 physiotherapists | Shoulder instability (n = 6) and rotator cuff related pain (n = 4); rehabilitation of the rotator cuff muscles (bi-articular muscles or multiple axial joints) | Interviews; Directed Content Analysis was undertaken to organise the qualitative data according to the four constructs of Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) |
Heinemann et al., 2018 [28]; USA | To describe clinicians’ experiences, evaluations, and training strategies using exoskeletons in rehabilitation and wellness settings | Qualitative focus groups | 30 healthcare professionals: 90% Physical therapist, 2% Administrative, 8% Other clinical role (exercise therapist, recreational therapist); mean age was 37, range = 28–53; 86% female | Spinal cord injuries; Standing and gait rehabilitation | Focus groups; thematic analysis |
Heinemann et al., 2020 [42]; USA | To describe appraisals of robotic exoskeletons for locomotion by potential users with spinal cord injuries, their perceptions of device benefits and limitations, and recommendations for manufacturers and therapists regarding device use | Qualitative focus groups | 35 patients; mean age = 48; 17% female | Spinal cord injuries; Gait rehabilitation | Focus groups; thematic analysis |
Hochstenbach-Waelen and Seelen, 2012 [55]; The Netherlands | To identify criteria and conditions that people, involved in development of rehabilitation technology for upper limb training of stroke patients, should take into account to achieve a (more) successful implementation of the technology in daily clinical practice | Literature search and interviews | 6 senior physiotherapists and occupational therapists | Stroke; upper limb rehabilitation | Semi-structured interviews; method of data analysis was not reported |
Hughes et al., 2011 [47]; UK | To understand the stroke participants’ experiences of using the novel combination of a robotic arm and iterative learning control system and to gain greater insight into how systems might be improved in the future | Mixed-methods study, involving open-ended and closed questions | 5 patients; mean age was 52 years (range = 38–77); 3 males and 2 females | Stroke; upper limb rehabilitation | Two ways data were collected: comments were recorded during the time when participants were receiving the intervention and immediately following the clinical study, an interview based question set was used; content analysis |
Huq et al., 2012 [36]; Canada | To develop a portable robotic system with a haptic interface that facilitates the concept of rehabilitation at a remote location, e.g., at a home; to develop a GUI that integrates different control techniques and VR games in the same screen, and allows therapists to easily interact with the system; and to evaluate the current system with therapists in a focus group study | Focus group study | 3 physiotherapists and 4 occupational therapists | Stroke; upper limb rehabilitation | Focus groups; summary of findings |
Kumar and Phillips, 2013 [48]; UK | To explore the views, experiences, benefits, and difficulties that users of one specific type of PMAS perceive, and determine which areas of daily life they are used in | Mixed-methods approach, including questionnaire and interviews | 13 patients; age range = 13–69 years (12 men and boys, mean age 25 years, mode age 14 years; and 1 woman, 69 years) | Neuromuscular conditions; upper limb rehabilitation | Semi-structured interviews; thematic analysis |
Lajeunesse et al., 2018 [37]; Canada | To present the perspectives of individuals with ASIA C or D incomplete SCI concerning the usability of lower limb exoskeletons to R&D engineers and clinicians working in motor rehabilitation | Exploratory qualitative research design with a user-centred approach | 13 patients; 6 males (mean age = 59.8) and 7 females (mean age = 43) | Incomplete spinal cord injury; lower limb rehabilitation | Individual, semi-structured interviews; inductive thematic analysis |
Lo et al., 2020 [56]; Asia, Australia, Europe and USA | To inform rehabilitation clinicians about the various aspects of adopting and integrating robotic stroke therapy into clinical settings | Qualitative description design | 8 rehabilitation therapists | Stroke and other neurological conditions, such as spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis (MS), brain tumours and traumatic brain injuries; upper and lower limb training | Semi-structured interviews; qualitative descriptive analysis |
Manns et al., 2019 [26]; Canada | To explore the expectations and experiences of persons with spinal cord injury, training with the ReWalk exoskeleton | Qualitative research design | 11 patients (mean age = 37.5, range = 18–65 years); 4 females and 7 males | Traumatic spinal cord injury; standing and walking training | Semi-structured interviews; thematic analysis |
Mortenson et al., 2020 [38]; Canada | To explore the experiences of physiotherapists with the introduction of an exoskeleton as a gait retraining device in a Canadian rehabilitation centre | Longitudinal qualitative study | 10 therapists (one group of therapists, n = 4, was formally trained using the device, whereas the other group only had clinical exposure to the device, n = 6); mean age = 40 years; 8 females and 2 males | Brain and spinal cord injuries; gait training | Semi-structured interviews; thematic analysis |
Nasr et al., 2015 [57]; UK, Italy and the Netherlands | To examine stroke survivors’ experiences of living with stroke and with technology in order to provide technology developers with insight into values, thoughts and feelings of the potential users of a to-be-designed robotic technology for home-based rehabilitation of the hand and wrist | Interdisciplinary research design and qualitative study | 10 households (10 patients and 8 carers); age range = 60–77; 7 males and 3 females | Stroke; upper limb rehabilitation | Application of qualitative methods such as in-depth interviews as well as using diaries and photography activities; thematic analysis |
O' Brien Cherry et al., 2017 [43]; USA | To determine participants’ general impressions about the benefits and barriers of using RT devices for in-home rehabilitation | Qualitative study design employing ethnographic- based anthropological methods | 10 veterans (plus their carers); age range = 49–88; all males | Stroke; upper or lower limb impairments | Direct observations and semi-structured interviews; inductive thematic analysis |
Phelan et al., 2015 [39]; Canada | To investigate the expectations and experiences of children with CP in relation to robotic gait training using the Lokomat Pro | An interpretivist qualitative design | 5 children (8–11 years; 3 boys and 2 girls) and their parents (28–52 years; 3 mothers and 2 fathers); | Cerebral palsy; gait rehabilitation | Observations during sessions, semi-structured interviews with parents and use of a customizable “toolbox” of age-appropriate child-friendly techniques; thematic analysis |
Read et al., 2020 [40]; Canada | To explore how the training and implementation of using the Ekso robotic exoskeleton with patients affects physiotherapists’ work | An exploratory qualitative research design | 3 physiotherapists | Individuals with SCIs and hemiplegia due to stroke; gait training | One-on-one semi-structured interviews; thematic analysis |
Sivan et al., 2016 [49]; UK | To evaluate the ICF as a framework to ensure that key aspects of user feedback are identified in the design and testing stages of development of a home-based upper limb rehabilitation system | Qualitative study | 17 patients and 7 physiotherapists and occupational therapists | Stroke; upper limb rehabilitation | Face-to-face semi-structured interviews; analysis based on the updated International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) linking rules and core set categories |
Stephenson and Stephens, 2018 [50]; UK | To explore physiotherapists' experience of using RT in rehabilitation of the upper limb, within a stroke rehabilitation centre | Phenomenological approach/qualitative study | 6 physiotherapists; 3 males and 3 females | Stroke; upper limb rehabilitation | Semi-structured interviews; thematic analysis |
Swank et al., 2020 [44]; USA | To describe therapists’ clinical practice experiences with robotic gait training (RGT) over 3 years during inpatient rehabilitation | Mixed methods study, including a survey and semi-structured focus group | 10 physical therapists | Condition not specified; gait training | Semi-structured focus group; thematic analysis |
Swank et al., 2020b [29]; USA | To determine the feasibility of integrating the Ekso Gait Training device into inpatient rehabilitation in a neurologic population | Longitudinal cohort design, including a focus group (therapists) and survey (therapists and patients) | Physical therapists (exact number not reported) | Stroke and SCI; gait training | Semi-structured focus group; thematic analysis |
Sweeney et al., 2020 [51]; UK | To understand user perceptions in order to explain low uptake of upper limb rehabilitation interventions after stroke in clinical practice within the National Health Service (NHS Scotland) | Qualitative study using a mixed-methods approach, consisting of a cross-sectional online survey with therapists and semi-structured interviews with stroke patients | 8 stroke patients from a Constraint Induced Movement Therapy (n = 2) and Robotic Therapy (n = 6) groups | Stroke; upper limb rehabilitation | Semi-structured interviews; thematic analysis |
Tedesco Triccas et al., 2018 [52]; UK | To explore views and experiences of people with sub-acute and chronic stroke that had previously taken part in a randomised controlled trial involving tDCS and RT for their impaired upper limb | A structured and semi-structured interview study, involving qualitative and quantitative components | 21 patients; 12 males and 9 females; mean age was 64.2 | Stroke; upper limb rehabilitation | Interviews involving open questions; thematic analysis |
Thomassen et al., 2019 [45]; USA | To generate new knowledge regarding user experiences of standing and walking with Ekso™ (Ekso Bionics, Richmond, CA, USA) | Qualitative (interview) study | 3 patients; all male of different ages (from young adult to middle aged) | Spinal cord injury (due to traumatic and non-traumatic reasons); standing and walking training | In-depth interviews in a phenomenological tradition; systematic inductive content analyses |
ASIA American Spinal Injury Association, CP cerebral palsy, f female(s), GUI graphical user interface, ICF International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health, LE lower extremity, m male(s), PMAS powered mobile arm support, R&D research and development, RT robotic therapy, RWD robotic walking device, SCI spinal cord injury, SPO SCRIPT Passive Orthosis, tDCS transcranial direct current stimulation, VR virtual reality