TABLE 3.

Perceptions of efficacy of MISEV and other ISEV efforts

In the overall quality/method reporting of literature since MISEV 2018, there has been:	Overall quality, % (n)	Method reporting, % (n)
…an improvement, and MISEV2018/other ISEV efforts have contributed to this	70.6 (488)	70.4 (483)
…an improvement, but not because of MISEV2018/other ISEV efforts	2.7 (19)	4.4 (30)
…no clear improvement or decline compared with previous years, perhaps because MISEV2018 is ineffective or its positive influence is balanced by a massive influx of low‐quality studies	17.2 (119)	18.2 (125)
…a decline despite MISEV2018 (e.g., because MISEV2018 has not had sufficient uptake in the field or is known but not followed)	1.4 (10)	1.0 (7)
Other (free‐form response)	7.9 (55)	6.0 (41)
Total respondents	691	686