Skip to main content
. 2021 Nov 23;18(1):e13287. doi: 10.1111/mcn.13287

Table 4.

Associations between consumption of specific food groups and mean WDDS with underweight, overweight and anaemia

Underweight BMI < 18.5 kg/m2

Overweight BMI ≥ 23 kg/m2

Anaemia Hgb < 120 g/L

Food group Odds ratio p‐value 95% CI Odds ratio p‐value 95% CI Odds ratio p‐value 95% CI
Dark green leafy vegetables
No Reference Reference Reference
Yes 0.92 0.509 0.72–1.18 1.01 0.888 0.84–1.22 0.81 0.027* 0.67–0.98
Vitamin A fruits and vegetables
No Reference Reference Reference
Yes 0.74 0.084 0.52–1.04 0.99 0.951 0.78–1.26 0.91 0.455 0.70–1.17
Other fruits and vegetables
No Reference Reference Reference
Yes 0.79 0.582 0.34–1.85 1.90 0.064 0.96–3.73 1.68 0.203 0.75–3.77
Organ meat
No Reference Reference Reference
Yes 2.76 0.152 0.68–11.11 0.78 0.694 0.23–2.66 0.20 0.150 0.021–1.82
Meat and fish
No Reference Reference Reference
Yes 0.84 0.172 0.66–1.08 1.03 0.730 0.86–1.24 1.01 0.920 0.85–1.20
Eggs
No Reference Reference Reference
Yes 0.75 0.047* 0.56–1.00 1.08 0.386 0.90–1.29 0.92 0.347 0.77–1.10
Legumes, nuts and seeds
No Reference Reference Reference
Yes 1.06 0.624 0.83–1.35 1.05 0.518 0.90–1.23 1.09 0.275 0.93–1.28
Milk and milk products
No Reference Reference Reference
Yes 1.01 0.937 0.78–1.30 0.90 0.231 0.76–1.07 0.99 0.912 0.81–1.20
WDDS 0.89 0.075 0.79–1.01 1.02 0.578 0.95–1.10 0.95 0.233 0.88–1.03

Note: n = 2653. Associations between WDDS, consumption of specific food groups and underweight, overweight and anaemia were assessed with separate logistic regression models. Associations were adjusted for women's age, women's education level, division, education level of the household head, wealth quintile and gender of the household head. All regression models were adjusted for the survey round.

Abbreviations: BMI, body mass index; CI, confidence interval; Hgb, haemoglobin; WDDS, Women's Dietary Diversity Score.

*

p < 0.05.