TABLE 3.
Patients on MHD |
Post hoc
b
|
||||||||
AAL no. | Brain regions | Anatomical classification | HCs n = 25 | Without CI n = 20 | With CI n = 19 | p | p1 | p2 | p2 |
Nodal local efficiency | |||||||||
4 | SFGdor.R | Frontal | 0.231 ± 0.015 | 0.250 ± 0.020 | 0.231 ± 0.013 | <0.00a | 0.002 | 1.000 | <0.001 |
28 | REC.R | Frontal | 0.234 ± 0.038 | 0.240 ± 0.038 | 0.167 ± 0.092 | 0.002a | 1.000 | 0.008 | 0.002 |
34 | DCG.R | Frontal | 0.223 ± 0.009 | 0.241 ± 0.011 | 0.235 ± 0.013 | <0.001a | <0.001 | 0.011 | 0.721 |
41 | AMYG.L | Temporal | 0.239 ± 0.039 | 0.150 ± 0.088 | 0.211 ± 0.069 | <0.001a | <0.001 | 0.212 | <0.001 |
80 | HES.R | Temporal | 0.267 ± 0.028 | 0.185 ± 0.095 | 0.138 ± 0.118 | <0.001a | 0.008 | <0.001 | 0.327 |
Nodal clustering coefficient | |||||||||
4 | SFGdor.R | Frontal | 0.170 ± 0.021 | 0.203 ± 0.038 | 0.170 ± 0.021 | <0.001a | 0.002 | 1.000 | < 0.001 |
28 | REC.R | Frontal | 0.191 ± 0.042 | 0.206 ± 0.044 | 0.135 ± 0.077 | <0.001a | 1.000 | 0.008 | 0.002 |
33 | DCG.L | Frontal | 0.153 ± 0.017 | 0.180 ± 0.028 | 0.164 ± 0.018 | <0.001a | 0.002 | 0.088 | 0.637 |
34 | DCG.R | Frontal | 0.153 ± 0.015 | 0.184 ± 0.022 | 0.174 ± 0.025 | 0.004a | <0.001 | 0.014 | 0.922 |
41 | AMYG.L | Temporal | 0.203 ± 0.042 | 0.126 ± 0.076 | 0.182 ± 0.062 | <0.001a | 0.001 | 0.432 | 0.081 |
80 | HES.R | Temporal | 0.242 ± 0.039 | 0.167 ± 0.086 | 0.118 ± 0.101 | <0.001a | 0.009 | < 0.001 | 0.193 |
aThe p-value was obtained by ANCOVA with age, sex, education years, and SDS scores as covariates and all p values corrected by FDR were less than 0.05.
bBonferroni corrected (p < 0.05) was used for the post hoc test. p1 = without CI vs. HCs; p2 = with CI vs. HCs; p3 = with CI vs. without CI.
Continuous values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation.
HCs, healthy controls; MHD, maintenance hemodialysis; CI, cognitive impairment; SFGdor, superior frontal gyrus, dorsolateral; REC, gyrus rectus; DCG, median cingulate and paracingulate gyri; AMYG, amygdala; HES, Heschl gyrus.