Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 13;8:789977. doi: 10.3389/fvets.2021.789977

Table 3.

In vivo efficacy of nanoparticles against H. contortus.

Nanoparticle Bioassay Biological species Size (nm) Concentration (mg/kg) Time (days) Efficacy (%) Model Reference
Nanoemulsion-chitosan EO FECR Worm burden Cymbopogon citratus 248 450 0 15 80
64
83.1
Sheep (23)
Chitosan-encapsulated EO (EncEs) Worm burden Eucalyptus staigeriana N/A 500 N/A 40.51 Mongolian gerbils (17)
365 30 83.75 Sheep (15)
Solid lipid nanocarriers
(nanoTTO)
Worm burden Melaleuca alternifolia 287 0.20
0.50
N/A 4.09
48.64
Mongolian gerbils (19)
Encapsulated bromelain FECR N/A N/A 3
10
30
28 5
56.6
68.8
Goats (32)
Chitosan encapsulated EcEO FECR Eucalyptus citriodora N/A 250 10 40.5 Sheep (16)
Encapsulated oils anethole + carvone FECR N/A N/A 50 45 Significantly reduced FEC Sheep (27)
Polycaprolactone thio1 nanoparticles (nano thio1) FECR Tagetes patula L. N/A 2,5 30 Kept the parasitic load stable Sheep (28)
EPG 2.5 30 45% Sheep (28)
Nanoemulsion
chitosan
EPG E. staigeriana 277 0.25 180 No significant difference was observed Sheep (21)

Key: N/A, data not available; EO, essential oil; nanoTTO, nano tea tree oil; FECR, fecal egg count reduction; EPG, eggs per gram of feces.