Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 13;12:753607. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.753607

Table 3.

Sensitivity analyses results a .

Odds ratio
Sample size PM2.5 (ug/m3, Per 10 units) PM10 (ug/m3, Per 10 units) NO2 (ug/m3, Per 10 units) SO2 (ug/m3, Per 10 units) CO (mg/m3, Per 1 units) O3 (ug/m3, Per 10 units)
A: Adjust the potential effect of city heterogeneity 4,920,536 1.04 (1.01, 1.08) 1.02 (1.01, 1.04) 1.12 (1.05, 1.18) 1.09 (1.05, 1.14) 1.42 (1.20, 1.68) 1.17 (1.10, 1.26)
B1: Adjusting for thyroid stimulating hormone 1,232,312 1.03 (1.03, 1.03) 1.02 (1.02, 1.02) 1.01 (1.01, 1.02) 1.09 (1.09, 1.10) 1.40 (1.37, 1.42) 1.13 (1.12, 1.13)
B2: Further adjusting for temperature 1,232,312 1.01 (1.01, 1.02) 1.01 (1.00, 1.01) 0.99 (0.99, 1.00) 1.08 (1.08, 1.09) 1.23 (1.20, 1.26) 1.12 (1.10, 1.12)
B3: Further adjusting for TT3 & TT4 83,7474 1.05 (1.05, 1.05) 1.02 (1.02, 1.02) 1.05 (1.05, 1.06) 1.09 (1.09, 1.10) 1.34 (1.32, 1.37) 1.10 (1.09,1.10)
a

Each model was basically adjusted for age, sex, fasting blood glucose, body mass index, triglyceride, low density lipoprotein, high density lipoprotein, Urine iodine, O3, Gross Domestic Product (GDP), education index and average smoking rate. P-values for trend in all models were all less than 0.05.