Table 3.
Reference | Four-site monofilament | 128 Hz tuning fork | Vibration perception threshold | Reflexes |
Bax et al24 | (Right): rater A: κ=0.52, rater B: κ=0.66 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.73) (Left): rater A: κ=0.54, rater B: κ=0.56 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.69) |
Biothesiometer hallux (right): rater A: κ=0.51, rater B: κ=0.57 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.68) Hallux (left): rater A: κ=0.64, rater B: κ=0.51 (95% CI 0.44 to 0.71) |
Rater A: κ=0.55 Rater B: κ 0.55 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.69) | |
Bril et al34 | Vibratron II COV (%)=31–34 Neurothesiometer COV (%)=6–8 | |||
Domínguez-Muñoz et al25 | Vibratron II ICC=0.958 (95% CI 0.94 to 0.98) | |||
Gentile et al36 | Biothesiometer hallux: COV (%)=16.5 ± 5.8 (4–21) Malleous: COV (%)=18.6 ± 9.5 (4.4–28) |
|||
Guy et al37 | Biothesiometer r=0.91 (95% CI) p<0.01 | |||
Lanting et al26 | κ=0.34 (95% CI 0.06 to 0.63) p<0.01 to κ=0.67 (95% CI 0.45 to 0.89) p<0.01 | κ=0.50 (95% CI 17 to 0.83) p<0.02 to κ=0.57 (95% CI 0.24 to 0.9) p<0.01 | Neurothesiometer κ=0.52 (95% CI 0.21 to 0.82) p<0.01 to κ=0.78 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.98) p<0.02 | |
Louraki et al (2013) | Biothesiometer hallux (left): κ=0.69 (±0.05) Hallux (right): κ=0.64 (±0.05) Tibia (left): κ=0.70 Tibia (right): κ=0.64 |
|||
Young et al (1992) | Biothesiometer: COV (%): 8.6 Neurothesiometer: COV (%): 8.1 |
ICC, intraclass correlation coefficient.