Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2021 Dec 27.
Published in final edited form as: Lancet Neurol. 2021 Sep;20(9):739–752. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00214-3

Table 1.

Participant characteristics.

NC (n=118) MCI (n=99) ADclin (n=58) lvPPA (n=15) PCA (n=2) CBS (n=79) PSP (n=74) bvFTD (n=62) nfvPPA (n=32) svPPA (n=27) DLB (n=14) TES (n=13) All (n=593)
Sex, M/F 55/63 55/44 25/33 7/8 0/2 36/43 34/40 37/25 17/15 11/16 9/5 13/0 299/294
Age, y 60.9 (18) 65.5 (13) 65.3 (10) 63.1 (9) 57.6 (11) 67.3 (8)a 68.5 (7)a 61.2 (10) 69.8 (7)a 70.0 (7)a 69.3 (6) 63.2 (13) 64.3 (13)
APOE E4 positivity N/total N (%) 31/109 (28%) 31/92 (34%) 37/58 (64%) 7/14 (50%) 2/2 (0%) 11/42 (26%) 11/53 (21%) 7/40 (18%) 5/28 (18%) 8/27 (30%) 4/13 (31%) 3/13 (23%) 155/491 (32%)
Disease severity
CDR sum of boxes 0 (0)b,c 2 (1)a,c 6 (3)a,b 3 (2)a 2 (0) 4 (3)a,b,c 4 (3)a,b 7 (4)a,b 3 (3)a,c 6 (3)a,b 5 (2)a,b 4 (2)a 3 (3)
N 113 47 58 15 2 79 70 62 31 27 13 13 582
SEADL, % 100 (1) 89 (18) 73 (21) 78 (13) - 55 (24)a,b 49 (26)a,b 50 (24)a,b 67 (25)a 58 (19)a,b 55 (7) - 65 (29)
N 55 20 3 4 - 65 64 48 22 17 2 - 300
FAQ 0 (0)b 5 (4)a 16 (8)a,b 10 (7)a 9 (8) 12 (7)a,b 14 (6)a,b 18 (7)a,b 11 (7)a 16.0 (8)a,b 15 (7)a,b 10 (7)a 10 (9)
N 83 85 56 14 2 42 49 37 11 27 14 13 433
GDS 3 (3) 8 (10) 8 (5) 14 (23)a 4 (1) 9 (11)a 10 (7)a 9 (17) 13 (26)a 7 (4) 9 (7) 10 (9) 8 (11)
N 103 87 49 13 2 65 60 52 20 17 8 10 486
Neuropsychology
MMSE 29 (1)c 27 (2)c 19 (7)a,b 22 (6)a,b 25 (1) 23 (6)a,b,c 25 (4)a,c 22 (8)a,b 22 (6)a 20 (8)a,b 24 (2)c 24 (7)a 24 (6)
N 82 86 54 14 2 40 49 37 11 27 13 12 427
Imaging
Total intracranial volume, L 1.5 (0.2) 1.5 (0.2) 1.5 (0.2) 1.5 (0.2) 1.4 (0) 1.5 (0.2) 1.5 (0.2) 1.5 (0.2) 1.5 (0.2) 1.5 (0.2) 1.6 (0.2) 1.7 (0.1)a,b,c 1.5(0.2)
N 118 87 55 15 2 68 65 51 31 26 7 11 536
Bilateral hippocampal volume, mm3* 5668 (606)b,c 5292 (825)a,c 4834 (698)a,b 5014 (688)a 5385 (478) 5330 (717)a,c 5287 (608)a,c 4816 (763)a,b 5341 (635)c 4166 (760)a,b,c 5802 (483)c 5349 (1114)a 5235 (793)
N 118 87 55 15 2 68 65 51 31 26 7 11 536
Amyloid-PET read, neg/pos (%positive) 53/11 (17%) 44/29 (40%) 0/54 (100%) 0/14 (100%) 0/2 (100%) 33/17 (34%) 24/3 (11%) 23/3 (12%) 19/5 (21%) 8/2 (20%) 2/1 (33%) 8/5 (38%) 214/146 (41%)
N 64 73 54 14 2 50 27 26 24 10 3 13 360
FTP-PET temporal meta ROI SUVR 1.1 (0.1)c 1.4 (0.3)c 2.0 (0.4)a,b 2.3 (0.4)a,b - 1.4 (0.4)c 1.2 (0.1)c 1.2 (0.1)c 1.1 (0.1)c 1.7 (0.5) 1.7 1.3 (0.4) 1.5 (0.5)
N 8 46 50 15 - 34 24 19 21 3 1 9 230
FTP-PET temporal meta ROI neg/pos(%positive) 8/0 (0%) 23/23 (50%) 0/50 (100%) 0/15 (100%) - 24/10 (29%) 21/3 (13%) 16/3 (16%) 18/3 (14%) 1/2 (67%) 0/1 (100%) 7/2 (22%) 118/112 (49%)
N 8 46 50 15 - 34 24 19 21 3 1 9 230
Fluid biomarkers
Plasma P-tau217, pg/mL** 0.17 (0.1)b,c 0.29 (0.3)a,c 0.72 (0.4)a,b 0.82 (0.2)a,b 0.80 (0.3) 0.27 (0.3)c 0.17 (0.1)c 0.20 (0.2)c 0.15 (0.1)c 0.23 (0.4)c 0.18 (0.1)c 0.25 (0.2) 0.28 (0.3)
N 118 99 58 15 2 79 74 62 32 27 14 13 593
Plasma P-tau181, pg/mL** 0.9 (1)b,c 1.2 (1)a,c 2.3 (1)a,b 2.5 (1)a,b 2.8 (1) 1.1 (1)c 1.0 (1)c 1.0 (1)c 0.7 (0)c 1.1 (1)c 1.0 (0)c 1.0 (0) 1.2 (1)
N 118 99 58 15 2 79 74 62 32 27 14 13 593
Plasma NfL, pg/mL** 20.3 (26) 19.3 (13) 24.2 (12) - - 51.2 (26)a,b,c 41.4 (24)a,b 55.9 (45)a,b,c 46.4 (27)a 59.9 (29)a,b,c - - 34.3 (30)
N 73 37 28 - - 34 50 28 10 8 - - 268
CSF P-tau181, pg/mL** 20.9 (8)b,c 28.7 (12)a 39.9 (18)a - - 22.5 (15)c 14.5 (5)b,c 20.2 (11)b,c 24.1 (7)c 16.8 (3) - - 23.4 (13)
N 48 23 24 - - 36 30 28 8 2 - - 199

Values shown as mean (standard deviation). Abbreviations: ADclin, Clinical Alzheimer’s disease; APOE, apolipoprotein E; BNT, Boston Naming Test; bvFTD, behavioral variant FTD; CDR, Clinical Dementia Rating; CBD, corticobasal degeneration; FAQ, Functional Activities Questionnaire ; FTP-PET, 18F-Flortaucipir; GDS, Geriatric depression scale; MCI, mild cognitive impairment; MMSE, Mini-Mental State Test; NfL, neurofilament light chain; NC, Normal control; SEADL, Schwab and England Activities of Daily Living; SUVR, Standardized Uptake Value Ratio; PET, positron emission tomography; P-tau, phosphorylated tau; PPA, primary progressive aphasia; PSP, progressive supranuclear palsy; TES, traumatic encephalopathy syndrome. Amyloid status was based on visual read.

*

ANCOVA corrected for TIV,

**

ANCOVA corrected for age and sex

a.

Indicates a statistically significant difference between groups (p < 0.05) with NC in ANCOVA with post hoc pairwise comparisons (Bonferroni)

b.

p < 0.05 vs MCI

c.

p < 0.05 vs ADclin