Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD003210. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003210.pub3

4. Results: quality assessment.

  Anand 1999 Braakman 1998b Harding 2001 Kuokkanen 1999 Statius Muller 2003
A. Was the assigned treatment adequately concealed prior to allocation? 0 1 1 1 1
B. Were the outcomes of participants who withdrew described and included in the analysis (intention‐to‐treat)? 0 1 0 2 1
C. Were the outcome assessors blinded to treatment status? 0 0 2 0 2
D. Were the treatment and control group comparable at entry? 0 1 1 1 1
E. Were the treatment providers blind to assignment status? 0 0 0 0 0
F. Were care programmes, other than the trial options, identical? 0 2 0 0 2
G. Were the inclusion and exclusion criteria clearly defined? 1 1 1 1 2
H. Were the interventions clearly defined? 0 2 1 2 2
I. Were the outcome measures used clearly defined? 1 2 1 2 1
J. Were diagnostic tests used in outcome assessment clinically useful? (by outcome) 1 1 1 1 1
K. Was the surveillance active, and of clinically appropriate duration? 1 2 0 1 1