Skip to main content
. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD003210. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003210.pub3

Comparison 1. Functional (taping) vs immobilization (POP splinting with immobilization of MCP and wrist joint).

Outcome or subgroup title No. of studies No. of participants Statistical method Effect size
1 Not fully satisfied at final follow up 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2 Decreased range of motion 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
2.1 At 1 week follow up 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.2 At 3 to 6 weeks follow up 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
2.3 At final follow up 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3 Loss of grip strength 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) Totals not selected
3.1 At 3 to 6 weeks follow up 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]
3.2 At final follow up 1   Risk Ratio (M‐H, Fixed, 95% CI) 0.0 [0.0, 0.0]