Table 3:
Consensus question | Yes | No |
---|---|---|
| ||
In the absence of syndromic manifestations, should an individual with bilateral or multifocal renal tumors have a histologic diagnosis prior to genetic risk assessment? | 57% | 43% |
| ||
In the absence of syndromic manifestations, should an individual with a solitary renal tumor with one or more hereditary risk factors have a histologic diagnosis prior to genetic risk assessment? | 41% | 59% |
| ||
In the absence of syndromic manifestations, should an individual with localized, bilateral or multifocal renal tumors have genetic risk assessment prior to management? | 79% | 21% |
| ||
In the absence of syndromic manifestations, should an individual with a localized, solitary renal tumor with one or more hereditary risk factors have genetic risk assessment prior to management? | 59% | 41% |
| ||
In an individual with a localized renal lesion less than 3 cm and strong suspicion for a hereditary cancer syndrome, should genetic risk assessment be performed prior to management? | 93% | 7% |
| ||
In metastatic disease that doesn’t require urgent treatment, when there is concern for hereditary form of RCC, do you think genetic risk assessment should be done before management is initiated? | 48% | 52% |
| ||
In a patient with a renal tumor and skin lesion(s) resembling those associated with a renal cancer syndrome, should a skin biopsy be required to guide genetic risk assessment? | 14% | 86% |
Statements in bold represent those with reached consensus