Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 15;2(12):1043–1048. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.212.BJO-2021-0145.R1

Table I.

Patient cohort characteristics.

Characteristic n Female (n = 46) Male (n = 44) Combined (n = 90) p-value
Age, yrs 90 < 0.001*
Median (IQR) 18 (16 to 21) 26 (21 to 33) 21 (18 to 28)
Mean (SD) 20 (5.7) 28.1 (9.0) 24.0 (8.5)
rACLR on dominant leg, % (n) 72 0.81
No 49 (19/39) 52 (17/33) 50 (36/72)
Yes 51 (20/39) 48 (16/33) 50 (36/72)
rACLR graft type, % (n) 90 0.34
Autograft BTB 52 (24/46) 39 (17/44) 46 (41/90)
Autograft hamstring 13 (6/46) 23 (10/44) 18 (16/90)
Allograft 35 (16/46) 39 (17/44) 37 (33/90)
Returned to play, % (n) 72 0.25
No 44 (17/39) 30 (10/33) 38 (27/72)
Yes 56 (22/39) 70 (23/33) 63 (45/72)
Time to return to play, mths 42 0.42*
Median (IQR) 7.2 (6.0 to 9.8) 9.0 (6.0 to 10.5) 8.5 (6.0 to 10.0)
Mean (SD) 8.9 (4.7) 10.3 (6.8) 9.6 (5.8)
Returned at same or higher level, % (n) 72 0.48
No 56 (22/39) 45 (15/33) 51 (37/72)
Yes 44 (17/39) 55 (18/33) 49 (35/72)
Currently playing, % (n) 72 0.73
No 82 (32/39) 79 (26/33) 81 (58/72)
Yes 18 (7/39) 21 (7/33) 19 (14/72)
If didn’t return, was knee the primary reason for not returning?, % (n) 58 > 0.999
No 28 (9/32) 31 (8/26) 29 (17/58)
Yes 72 (23/32) 69 (18/26) 71 (41/58)
*

Mann-Whitney U test.

Chi-squared test.

BTB, bone-patellar tendon-bone; IQR, interquartile range; rACLR, revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; SD, standard deviation.