TABLE 3.
ANCOVA comparisons of conditions on prosocial affordances and topic interesta
Prosocial affordance beliefs | Topic interest | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Tukey’s HSD comparisons | Tukey’s HSD comparisons | ||||||
Condition | n | Mean | Prosocial utility | General utility | Mean | Prosocial utility | General utility |
Prosocial utility | 78 | 4.80 (1.11) | 4.26(1.08) | ||||
General utility | 55 | 4.26 (1.11) | 0.007 | 3.86(1.08) | 0.037 | ||
Neutral | 62 | 4.07 (1.10) | <0.001 | 0.339 | 3.84(1.07) | 0.025 | 0.928 |
aMeans for prosocial affordance beliefs are adjusted to control for perceived competence and baseline prosocial affordance beliefs. Means for topic interest are adjusted to control for perceived competence and baseline topic interest. Values in parentheses indicate standard deviations. Tukey’s HSD (honestly significant difference) comparisons are p values adjusted for multiple comparisons.