Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 22;13(6):373–384. doi: 10.4047/jap.2021.13.6.373

Table 2. Comparison of the results of maxillary left second premolar tooth according to the groups.

InEos X5 Omnicam Primescan D900L Trios 3 Trios 4 Test statistic P
Marginal 105.3 ± 11.2a 105.3 ± 18.5a 86.9 ± 19.2a 139.5 ± 16.0b 98.1 ± 16.8a 92.8 ± 12.4a F = 16.214 < .001*
104.7 98.0 80.1 142.0 104.0 92.0
(91.6 - 125.8) (81.6 - 132.2) (66.7 - 126.8) (108.7 - 161.5) (72.6 - 121.5) (67.1 - 116.6)
Axial 112.7 ± 13.6bc 97.9 ± 17.0ac 92.4 ± 14.8a 120.0 ± 7.8b 101.4 ± 16.0ac 99.1 ± 12.1ac F = 6.663 < .001*
110.7 99.7 88.9 122.1 99.1 96.3
(90.6 - 142.5) (68.7 - 125.5) (75.4 - 120.3) (106.6 - 129.3) (81.9 - 137.9) (80.8 - 125.1)
Axio-occlusal 121.6 ± 11.9bc 121.1 ± 20.5bc 116.4 ± 7.2c 135.1 ± 14.6b 92.6 ± 21.2a 89.4 ± 15.6a F = 13.506 < .001*
118.3 115.2 113.8 139.6 88.1 95.1
(106.7 - 143.0) (93.8 - 154.1) (107.8 - 128.9) (112.8 - 154.0) (63.2 - 120.0) (58.8 - 115.2)
Occlusal 133.9 ± 29.9 121.3 ± 25.3 134.7 ± 22.0 141.2 ± 12.2 101.2 ± 20.1 89.1 ± 13.9 χ2 = 35.18 < .001*
134.9 122.7 135.2 145.6 103.1 89.1
(48.5 - 165.0)b (76.9 - 149.3)ab (97.9 - 169.0)b (108.7 - 153.1)b (64.9 - 127.1)a (60.6 - 107.4)a
Internal 122.7 ± 13.7bd 113.4 ± 17.4bc 114.5 ± 12.0cd 132.1 ± 6.1b 98.4 ± 16.8ac 92.5 ± 11.1a F = 26.504 < .001*
126.4 106.9 114.0 130.2 92.7 91.5
(90.3 - 141.6) (91.2 - 142.4) (95.0 - 131.5) (124.9 - 142.4) (70.0 - 119.0) (70.5 - 109.2)

F: One-way analysis of variance test statistic (Welch), χ2: Kruskal Wallis test statistic, a - d: No difference between groups with the same letter mean ± s. deviation, median (minimum - maximum), * P < .05 indicates a significant difference.