Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 20;2021:4014601. doi: 10.1155/2021/4014601

Table 1.

Characteristics of included studies.

Study Age (years) Sex (male/female) ECOG performance status (0/≥1) KRAS status (wild/mutated) Methods Sample mOS (months) mPFS (months)
Mayer et al. 2015 [4] 63 (27-82) 326/208 301/233 272/262 TAS-102 534 7.1 (6.5-7.8) 2 (1.9-2.1)
63 (27-82) 165/101 147/119 131/135 Placebo 266 5.3 (4.6-6.0) 1.7 (1.7-1.8)
Pfeiffer et al. 2020 [15] 64 (57-69) 24/22 23/23 19/27 TAS-102+B 46 NA 4.6 (3.5-6.5)
67 (58-72) 30/17 15/32 18/29 TAS-102 47 NA 2.6 (1.6-3.5)
Sueda et al. 2016 [16] 66 (44-80) 10/4 1/13 9/5 TAS-102 14 6.3 (3.21-9.93) 1 (0.92-6.39)
59 (37-83) 12/11 10/13 12/11 REG 23 5.8 (3.7-11.7) 0 (1.64-4.52)
Masuishi et al. 2017 [17] NA 30/24 NA 21/32 TAS-102 54 6.5 (5.3-8.3) 2.1 (1.8-3.1)
NA 90/56 NA 78/67 REG 146 6.7 (5.8-7.6) 2.1 (1.8-2.5)
Makiyama et al. 2018 [18] 66 (39-82) 6/5 5/6 NA TAS-102+B 11 Not reached 5.8
69 (47-82) 20/13 11/22 NA TAS-102 33 6.4 1.8
Yoshino et al. 2012 [5] 63 (28-80) 64/48 72/40 54/45 TAS-102 112 9.0 (7.3-11.3) NA
62 (39-79) 28/29 35/22 24/26 Placebo 57 6.6 (4.9-8.0) NA
Cutsem et al. 2017 [9] 60.2 (11.86) 31/33 28/36 35/29 TAS-102 64 6.5 NA
58.5 (11.02) 18/17 13/22 17/18 Placebo 35 4.3 NA
61.8 (9.98) 167/104 138/133 123/148 TAS-102 271 NA NA
62.1 (10.42) 82/50 68/64 68/64 Placebo 132 NA NA
61.9 (10.09) 113/65 128/50 94/84 TAS-102 178 7.8 NA
62.1 (10.40) 58/30 60/28 40/48 Placebo 88 6.7 NA
Xu et al. 2017 [10] 58 (26-81) 170/101 64/207 172/99 TAS-102 271 7.8 (7.1-8.8) NA
56 (24-80) 84/51 30/105 85/50 Placebo 135 7.1 (5.9-8.2) NA
Longo-Muñoz et al. 2016 [19] 5 (27-81) 48/32 24/56 35/45 TAS-102 80 6.8 2
5 (39-78) 21/11 11/21 17/15 Placebo 32 4.6 1.7
Moriwaki et al. 2018 [20] 64 (29-86) 197/130 128/199 160/161 TAS-102 327 7.4 (6.6-8.3) NA
64 (31-84) 126/97 95/128 88/109 REG 223 7.9 (6.8-9.2) NA
Kotani et al. 2019 [21] 60 (23-79) 35/25 35/25 28/32 TAS-102+B 60 8.6 (6.9-10.3) 3.7 (2.3-5.1)
65 (30-80) 42/24 42/24 30/36 TAS-102 66 8.0 (6.7-9.4) 2.2 (1.8-2.6)
Fujii et al. 2020 [11] 67 (50-74) 13/8 NA 10/11 TAS-102+B 21 14.4 (7.9-NA) NA
67.5 (59.8-71.2) 16/20 NA 16/20 TAS-102 36 4.5 (3.2-6.5) NA
Ogata et al. 2020 [22] 68 (40-85) 38/39 35/42 53/24 TAS-102 77 11.4 3.3
66 (41-81) 30/27 30/27 36/21 REG 57 9.9 2
Nose et al. 2020 [23] 73 (49-90) 16/16 12/20 14/17 TAS-102+B 32 11.7 4.7
70.5 (43-88) 15/9 7/17 14/10 TAS-102 24 6.3 1.8
Cicero et al. 2020 [24] 78 (70-86) 28/22 18/32 18/22 TAS-102 50 6.7 (5.7-11.3) 2.1 (1.2-3.2)
Cecchini et al. 2021 [25] NA NA NA NA TAS-102 41 6.8 (5.7-10) 2.7 (2.4-4.8)
Sforza et al. 2017 [26] 65 (48-82) 31/12 27/16 16/27 TAS-102 43 6.6 (2.8-10.4) 2.8 (2.5-3.1)
Montes et al. 2020 [27] 63 (37-83) 108/52 18/142 57/103 TAS-102 160 7.64 (6.15-9.13) 2.75 (2.57-2.94)
Takahashi et al. 2021 [28] 73 (65-81) 21/9 NA NA TAS-102 30 5.7 (3.7-8.9) 2.3 (1.9-4.3)
Kwakman et al. 2018 [29] 62 (30-88) 92/44 46/90 53/83 TAS-102 136 5.4 (4.0-6.9) 2.1 (1.8-2.3)
Moehler et al. 2021 [30] 60 (35-78) 6/6 6/6 NA TAS-102 12 11.1 (2.3-18.2) 3.81 (1.51-5.29)
Yoshida et al. 2020 [31] 67 (45-78) 20/12 23/9 14/18 TAS-102+B 32 9.2 (5.5-12.8) 4.5 (1.8-7.1)
Wallander et al. 2020 [32] 65 (38-78) 28/20 13/34 17/29 TAS-102 48 6.4 (4.4-8.4) 2.3 (1.8-2.7)
Satake et al. 2020 [33] 69 (33-82) 24/20 25/19 25/19 TAS-102+B 44 10.86 (8.32-13.68) 4.29 (2.54-5.83)
Carries et al. 2019 [34] 65.29 (40-88) 49/35 13/71 31/53 TAS-102 84 8.3 (6.23-9.87) 2.62 (2.32-3.05)