Abstract
Background
The vascular flora of the Dokdo Islands has been reported, based on primary collections made in 2012 and 2013 and legacy botanical literature. The Dokdo Islands are the remotest islands of Korea, located in the East Sea approximately 87 km from Ulleungdo Islands. They comprise two main volcanic islands, Dongdo (east islands) and Seodo (west islands) and minor islets surrounding the two main islands. This research was conducted to document vascular plant species inhabiting Korea's most inaccessible islands. We present a georeferenced dataset of vascular plant species collected during field studies on the Dokdo Islands over the past seven decades.
New information
In the present inventory of the flora of Dokdo, there are listed 108 species belonging to 78 genera and 39 families, including 93 native species and 15 newly human-induced naturalised species for these Islands' flora. The Poaceae and Asteraceae families are the most diverse, with 22 and 15 taxa, respectively. Some of the previously-listed taxa were not found on Dokdo probably because they are rare and the limited time did not allow collectors to find rare species. The spread of introduced species, especially the invasive grass Bromuscatharticus Vahl., affects several native species of Dokdo flora.
Keywords: biodiversity, Bromuscatharticus, Dokdo, flora, invasive species, islands, vascular plants
Introduction
Biodiversity researchers have identified critical gaps in spatial, temporal and taxonomic coverage of biodiversity observations highlighting barriers to effective data collection, open access and analysis (Amano et al. 2016, Wetzel et al. 2018). To bridge these gaps, biodiversity data must suit the demands of multiple groups, including scientists, policy-makers and data contributors (Taylor et al. 2017). Several biodiversity data researchers have emphasised taking the lead in developing new measures. Options like open access publishing with conventional licences accessibility through major biodiversity platforms, such as GBIF, can be used (Faith et al. 2013). The next solution is offering data providers incentives, such as the option to publish in peer-reviewed data journals (Chavan and Penev 2011). Biodiversity data providers should become better data stewards, with a comprehensive understanding of metadata, best data management practices and plans for data archiving and preservation (Hartter et al. 2013, Penev et al. 2017). However, data stewardship takes time and resources and data providers cannot be data stewards without sufficient resources and support. The evolution of data stewardship culture causes biodiversity informatics challenges to emerge as data volume and precision increase. Biodiversity data scientists propose that data providers and stakeholders confront current challenges prividing them with detailed recommendations (Ariño et al. 2016).
Geographical location and security level are the main factors causing spatial gaps (Ariño et al. 2016). As biodiversity information is closely related to the temporal and spatial variation in surveying effort, Wallacean shortfall is specifically critical in remote and inaccessible areas (Hortal et al. 2008, Boakes et al. 2010). Sampling certain places better than others is inevitable given the accessibility differences between localities (Rodrigues et al. 2010); therefore, distribution data tend to be heavily biased with historical collection patterns, collation and biodiversity data accumulation (Rodrigues et al. 2010, Meyer et al. 2015). To effectively bridge spatial gaps, it is essential to comprehend the causes for data shortage in some regions. In the case of Banco de Datos de Biodiversidad de Canaris (BIOTA-Canarias, Hortal et al. 2007), it stated that the lack of completeness or large gaps in their spatial coverage compromises their future utility. The previously collected data have limited utility because the data lack detail and geographical coverage is not exhaustive (Soberón et al. 2007). Biodiversity data scientists encourage exhaustive compilation of all available information with sufficient quality and detail (Hortal et al. 2008).
The Dokdo Islands are the most inaccessible islands in Korea, located at 37°14'26.8"N and 131°52'10.4"E, belonging to an administrative district that includes the Ulleung Islands. Since the first botanical survey (Lee 1952), seventy years of sporadic observations have waited to be mobilised to accessible biodiversity data (Jung et al. 2014). This study produces an exhaustive and reliable list of vascular plants from the Dokdo Islands, based on reference herbarium specimens collected in the field and the occurrence data available in the papers (Kim and Lee 2021).
General description
Purpose
This research focused on the digitisation of plant distribution data on Dokdo Islands acquired by botanists on occasional expeditions to the Islands between 1947 and 2018. These data offer a promising tool to help guide the biodiversity management and conservation of these highly inaccessible island ecosystems.
Project description
Title
Vascular plants occurrences in Dokdo Islands, Korea, based on herbarium collections and legacy botanical literature.
Personnel
The datasets were digitised by Hui Kim (data manager), Su-Young Jung was the resource creator and Shin Young Kwon, Hyun Tak Shin and Chin-Sung Chang were the content providers. Chin-Sung Chang checked taxonomic changes and georeferencing. S.Y. Jung conducted the field works for two years, from April 2012 to September 2013, collaborating with members from Korea National Arboretum (Jung et al. 2014). S.Y. Jung did preliminary in situ identifications. S.Y. Jung, Hui Kim and Chin-Sung Chang conducted the final species identification.
Study area description
The small islands of Dokdo are volcanic rocks formed in the Cenozoic era, more specifically 4.6-2.5 million years ago, having a formation mechanism similar to underwater islands (Jo et al. 2021, Kim et al. 2013). The Dokdo Volcano rises roughly 2,100 m a.s.l. and has a diameter of more than 10 km (Song et al. 2017). The Islands have a butterfly wing shape, a relatively steep terrain, a peak elevation of 168 m a.s.l. and a surface area of 18.7 hectares (Fig. 1). The Dokdo Islands consist of two main islets, Seodo and Dongdo, with numerous surrounding rocks. Sedo has multiple berth and tracking routes access points and flora surveys and collections are possible over a comparatively large area. Since Dongdo is more difficult to access by boat, it is challenging to investigate the surface, except there are fewer primary species occurrence data in a few points. Dokdo Islands had a mean annual temperature of 13.8°C, mean annual precipitation of 589 mm, an absolute minimum temperature of -6.4°C and an absolute maximum temperature of 28.2°C. According to meteorologists, automatic weather systems underestimate the amount of snowfall, thereby resulting in missing data (Kim and Park 2017).
Location and general topography of Dokdo Islands in East Sea.
Figure 1a.

Black arrow points to the location of Dokdo Islands.
Figure 1b.

Topography of Dokdo Islands.
Sampling methods
Study extent
The Dokdo Islands are the most inaccessible islands in Korea, located at 37°14'26"N and 131°52'05"E, belonging to an administrative district that includes the Ulleung Islands.
Sampling description
The vascular plant occurrence data, treated in this study, were compiled using fieldwork from 2012 to 2013 and botanical legacy articles from 1947 to 2018. Herbarium surveys were conducted in two Herbaria, including SNUA (Seoul National University, College of Agriculture, herbarium acronym following Index Herbariorum) and KH (Korea National Arboretum). In addition to the authors’ collections, datasets on vascular plant occurrences in Dokdo Islands were digitised from several manuscripts in a heterogeneous format (Lee 1952, Lee and Joo 1958, Lee 1978, Sun et al. 2002, Hyun and Kwon 2006, Lee et al. 2007, Park and Lee 2008, Park et al. 2010, Song and Park 2012, Jung et al. 2014, Park et al. 2014, Kim and Lee 2016, Park et al. 2016, Park et al. 2017, Park et al. 2018, Table 1). References to the published literature, from which data were obtained for the occurrence data compilation, are presented in the bibliography section of the metadata.
Table 1.
Data sources for the dataset of vascular plants occurrences in Dokdo Islands.
| Data source | Type of occurrence data | Number of occurrences | Field year |
| Lee 1952 | Literature | 36 | 1947 |
| Lee and Joo 1958 | Literature | 23 | 1958 |
| Lee 1978 | Herbarium | 37 | 1978 |
| Sun et al. 2002 | Literature | 69 | 1996-1999 |
| Hyun and Kwon 2006 | Literature | 49 | 2006 |
| Lee et al. 2007 | Literature | 49 | 2007 |
| Park and Lee 2008 | Literature | 57 | 2008 |
| Park et al. 2010 | Literature | 58 | 2008-2009 |
| Song and Park 2012 | Literature | 60 | 2008-2011 |
| Jung et al. 2014 | Herbarrium/ Literature | 91 | 2012-2013 |
| Park et al. 2014 | Literature | 65 | 2013-2014 |
| Kim and Lee 2016 | Literature | 54 | 2015-2016 |
| Park et al. 2016 | Literature | 56 | 2016 |
| Park et al. 2017 | Literature | 66 | 2017 |
| Park et al. 2018 | Literature | 68 | 2017-2018 |
| Total | 838 |
Quality control
The Dokdo Islands occurrence dataset was manually digitised from scanned documents of the original papers. The quality control processes of biodiversity data management were based on the principles of data quality by Chapman (2005) . Scientific names and locality names in the digitised datasets were retained exactly as in the original papers. The authors used the provisional checklist of vascular plants for the Korea Peninsula Flora to determine the accepted names (Chang et al. 2014). All scientific names were cross-checked and taxonomically updated using the taxonomic module of Botanical Research and Herbarium Management System (BRAHMS; Pouwer et al. 2008); more details on the digitisation steps, structure of the data and quality control measures are presented below.
Step description
1. The content providers carefully reviewed individual floristic publications to manage the irregularity in the format of historical papers. All occurrence records were merged into a spreadsheet, which contained the original species names recorded at the location. In this digitisation stage, obvious typographic errors were corrected. Accepted taxon names and taxonomic classification derived from the local checklist (Chang et al. 2014) were included in the spreadsheet. The result of the above digitisation steps was 838 records with 25 columns containing occurrence data of 108 vascular plant taxa.
2. MS Access was used to create the BRAHMS database layout. All specimen and occurrence information were recorded in the BRAHMS database of the T.B. Lee Herbarium.
3. In the literature data, we frequently encountered several uncertain dates of field works, for instance, 13 July 2017; 26 September 2017; 17 April 2018; 19-20 June 2018; 18 September 2018, for 68 collections by Park et al. (2018). When the collection date was written as “several dates,” we transcribed the last dates of field works (day, month and year) and provided the full interval date in the eventDate field and the rest of the general information in the verbatimEventDate field. Park and Lee (2008) and Park et al. (2017) published the floristic list of Dokdo Islands with many vascular plant pictures. As these authors did not provide the collection information, the publication year was used as the year of events.
4. All occurrence records without coordination were georeferenced, either from the coordinates provided in the paper or from the geographic description of the localities. The coordinate uncertainty in metres for each occurrence was estimated employing the algorithm of Wieczorek et al. (2010).
5. Occurrence data in BRAHMS could be easily exported in various formats, including Darwin Core for uploading to the EABCN IPT. The Darwin Core standard was applied to the BRAHMS extract/query file structure to accommodate the relevant information extracted from the publications.
Geographic coverage
Description
Dokdo Islands, Ulleung-gun, Geongsangbuk-do, the Republic of Korea (approximately 37°14'26"N, 131°52'5"E)
Coordinates
37.225 and 37.255 Latitude; 131.823 and 131.9 Longitude.
Taxonomic coverage
Description
All vascular plants were identified to infraspecific level. This dataset contains distribution information for 108 vascular plant species belonging to 39 families (Table 2).
Table 2.
Classification of species according to the criteria of Family, Habitat and Geographical origin is based on Chang et al. (2014).
| Number | SPECIES | FAMILY | HABIT | Geographic Origin | |
| 1 | Tetragoniatetragonoides (Pall.) Kuntze | Aizoaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 2 | Achyranthesbidentata Blume | Amaranthaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 3 | AchyranthesbidentataBlumevar.japonica Miq. | Amaranthaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 4 | Cnidiumjaponicum Miq. | Apiaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 5 | Oenanthejavanica (Blume) DC. | Apiaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 6 | Metaplexisjaponica (Thunb.) Makino | Apocynaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 7 | Artemisiacodonocephala Diels | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 8 | Artemisiaindica Willd. | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 9 | Artemisiajaponica Thunb. | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 10 | Artemisiakoidzumii Nakai | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 11 | Artemisiamontana (Nakai) Pamp. | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 12 | Artemisiascoparia Waldst. & Kit. | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 13 | Asterspathulifolius Maxim. | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 14 | Dendranthemanaktongense (Nakai) Tzvelev | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 15 | Farfugiumjaponicum (L.) Kitam. | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 16 | Seneciovulgaris L. | Asteraceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 17 | Sonchusasper (L.) Hill | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 18 | Sonchusbrachyotus DC. | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 19 | Sonchusoleraceus L. | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 20 | Taraxacumplatycarpum Dahlst. | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 21 | Youngiajaponica (L.) DC. | Asteraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 22 | Arabisserrata Franch. & Sav. | Brassicaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 23 | Arabisstelleri DC. | Brassicaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 24 | Brassicajuncea (L.) Czern. | Brassicaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 25 | Capsellabursa-pastoris (L.) Medik. | Brassicaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 26 | Lepidiumvirginicum L. | Brassicaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 27 | Raphanussativus L. | Brassicaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 28 | Campanulapunctata Lam. | Campanulaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 29 | Loniceramorrowii A.Gray | Caprifoliaceae | Shrub | Native | |
| 30 | Dianthuslongicalyx Miq. | Caryophyllaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 31 | Gypsophilaoldhamiana Miq. | Caryophyllaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 32 | Saginajaponica (Sw.) Ohwi | Caryophyllaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 33 | Saginamaxima A.Gray | Caryophyllaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 34 | Stellariaaquatica (L.) Scop. | Caryophyllaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 35 | Stellariamedia (L.) Vill. | Caryophyllaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 36 | Stellarianeglecta Weihe | Caryophyllaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 37 | Euonymushamiltonianus Wall. | Celastraceae | Shrub | Native | |
| 38 | Euonymusjaponicus Thunb. | Celastraceae | Shrub | Native | |
| 39 | Atriplexgmelinii C.A.Mey. ex Bong. | Chenopodiaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 40 | Atriplexsubcordata Kitag. | Chenopodiaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 41 | Chenopodiumalbum L. | Chenopodiaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 42 | Chenopodiumgiganteum D.Don | Chenopodiaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 43 | Chenopodiumglaucum L. | Chenopodiaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 44 | Chenopodiumstenophyllum (Makino) Koidz. | Chenopodiaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 45 | Hypericumerectum Thunb. | Clusiaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 46 | Commelinacommunis L. | Commelinaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 47 | Calystegiasoldanella (L.) R.Br. | Convolvulaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 48 | Ipomoeapurpurea (L.) Roth | Convolvulaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 49 | Phedimusmiddendorffianus (Maxim.) 't Hart | Crassulaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 50 | Sedumjaponicum Siebold ex Miq. | Crassulaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 51 | Sedumkamtschaticum Fisch. & C.A.Mey. | Crassulaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 52 | Sedumoryzifolium Makino | Crassulaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 53 | Cucumismelo L. | Cucurbitaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 54 | Cyperusmicroiria Steud. | Cyperaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 55 | Cyrtomiumfalcatum (L.f.) C.Presl | Dryopteridaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 56 | Elaeagnusmacrophylla Thunb. | Elaeagnaceae | Liana | Native | |
| 57 | Machilusthunbergii Siebold & Zucc. ex Meisn. | Lauraceae | Tree | Native | |
| 58 | Alliumfistulosum L. | Liliaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 59 | Alliummacrostemon Bunge | Liliaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 60 | Asparaguscochinchinensis (Lour.) Merr. | Liliaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 61 | Asparagusschoberioides Kunth | Liliaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 62 | Liliumlancifolium Thunb. | Liliaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 63 | Liriopemuscari (Decne.) L.H.Bailey | Liliaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 64 | Maianthemumdilatatum (A.W.Wood) A.Nelson & J.F.Macbr. | Liliaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 65 | Hibiscussyriacus L. | Malvaceae | Shrub | Introduced | |
| 66 | Cocculusorbiculatus (L.) DC. | Menispermaceae | Liana | Native | |
| 67 | Orobanchecoerulescens Stephan | Orobanchaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 68 | Oxaliscorniculata L. | Oxalidaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 69 | Oxalisstricta L. | Oxalidaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 70 | CorydalisheterocarpaSiebold & Zucc.var.japonica (Franch. & Sav.) Ohwi | Papaveraceae | Herb | Native | |
| 71 | Pinusthunbergii Parl. | Pinaceae | Tree | Native | |
| 72 | Plantagoasiatica L. | Plantaginaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 73 | Bromuscatharticus Vahl | Poaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 74 | Cleistogeneshackelii (Honda) Honda | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 75 | Digitariaciliaris (Retz.) Koeler | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 76 | Digitariaradicosa (J.Presl) Miq. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 77 | Digitariaviolascens Link | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 78 | Echinochloacrus-galli (L.) P.Beauv. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 79 | Echinochloaoryzoides (Ard.) Fritsch | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 80 | Eleusineindica (L.) Gaertn. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 81 | Elymuskamoji (Ohwi) S.L.Chen | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 82 | Festucaovina L. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 83 | Festucarubra L. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 84 | Imperatacylindrica (L.) Raeusch. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 85 | Miscanthussinensis Andersson | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 86 | Pennisetumglaucum (L.) R.Br. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 87 | Phragmitesjaponicus Steud. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 88 | Poaannua L. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 89 | Poapratensis L. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 90 | Puccinellianipponica Ohwi | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 91 | Setariafaberi R.A.W.Herrm. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 92 | Setariapumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult. | Poaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 93 | Setariaviridis (L.) P.Beauv. | Poaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 94 | Zoysiajaponica Steud. | Poaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 95 | Fallopiasachalinensis (F.Schmidt) Ronse Decr. | Polygonaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 96 | Persicarialongiseta (Bruijn) Kitag. | Polygonaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 97 | Polygonumaviculare L. | Polygonaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 98 | Rumexcrispus L. | Polygonaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 99 | Rumexjaponicus Houtt. | Polygonaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 100 | Portulacaoleracea L. | Portulacaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 101 | Lysimachiamauritiana Lam. | Primulaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 102 | Ranunculussilerifolius H.Lév. | Ranunculaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 103 | Rubusphoenicolasius Maxim. | Rosaceae | Shrub | Native | |
| 104 | Lycopersiconesculentum Mill. | Solanaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 105 | Solanumamericanum Mill. | Solanaceae | Herb | Introduced | |
| 106 | Camelliajaponica L. | Theaceae | Shrub | Native | |
| 107 | Violakusanoana Makino | Violaceae | Herb | Native | |
| 108 | Ampelopsisglandulosa(Wall.)Momiy.var.heterophylla (Thunb.) Momiy. | Vitaceae | Liana | Native | |
Traits coverage
Data coverage of traits
PLEASE FILL IN TRAIT INFORMATION HERE
Temporal coverage
Notes
Sampling was conducted on several occasions in the period between 1947 and 2018.
Usage licence
Usage licence
Creative Commons Public Domain Waiver (CC-Zero)
IP rights notes
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) 4.0 License.
Data resources
Data package title
Vascular plant occurrences in Dokdo Islands, Korea, based on herbarium collections and legacy botanical literature.
Resource link
https://www.gbif.org/dataset/37663a11-6c27-4b72-a3bc-75c9dab75a83
Alternative identifiers
Number of data sets
1
Data set 1.
Data set name
Vascular plant occurrences in Dokdo Islands, Korea, based on herbarium collections and legacy botanical literature.
Data format
Darwin Core Archive
Number of columns
37
Download URL
https://www.gbif.org/dataset/37663a11-6c27-4b72-a3bc-75c9dab75a83
Description
The present project was focused on digitising the data on plant distribution on Dokdo Islands, collected between 1947 and 2018 by botanists taking part in occasional expeditions to the Islands. These data are expected to contribute to the biodiversity management and conservation of these highly inaccessible island ecosystems.
Data set 1.
| Column label | Column description |
|---|---|
| occurrenceID | An identifier for the Occurrence (as opposed to a particular digital record of the occurrence). In the absence of a persistent global unique identifier, construct one from a combination of identifiers in the record that will most closely make the occurrenceID globally unique. |
| recordedBy | A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations responsible for recording the original Occurrence. The primary collector or observer, especially the one who applies a personal identifier (recordNumber), should be listed first. |
| type | The nature or genre of the resource. |
| basisOfRecord | The specific nature of the data record. |
| institutionCode | The name (or acronym) in use by the institution having custody of the object(s) or information referred to in the record. |
| recordNumber | An identifier given to the Occurrence at the time it was recorded. Often serves as a link between field notes and an Occurrence record, such as a specimen collector's number. |
| day | The integer day of the month on which the Event occurred. |
| month | The integer month in which the Event occurred. |
| year | The four-digit year in which the Event occurred, according to the Common Era Calendar. |
| eventDate | The date-time or interval during which an Event occurred. For occurrences, this is the date-time when the event was recorded. Not suitable for a time in a geological context. |
| verbatimEventDate | The verbatim original representation of the date and time information for an Event. |
| country | The name of the country or major administrative unit in which the Location occurs. |
| countryCode | The standard code for the country in which the Location occurs. |
| stateProvince | The name of the next smaller administrative region than country (state, province, canton, department, region etc.) in which the Location occurs. |
| county | The full, unabbreviated name of the next smaller administrative region than stateProvince (county, shire, department etc.) in which the Location occurs. |
| locality | The specific description of the place. Less specific geographic information can be provided in other geographic terms (higherGeography, continent, country, stateProvince, county, municipality, waterBody, island, islandGroup). This term may contain information modified from the original to correct perceived errors or standardise the description. |
| decimalLatitude | The geographic latitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location. Positive values are north of the Equator, negative values are south of it. Legal values lie between -90 and 90, inclusive. |
| decimalLongitude | The geographic longitude (in decimal degrees, using the spatial reference system given in geodeticDatum) of the geographic centre of a Location. Positive values are east of the Greenwich Meridian, negative values are west of it. Legal values lie between -180 and 180, inclusive. |
| geodeticDatum | The ellipsoid, geodetic datum or spatial reference system (SRS) upon which the geographic coordinates given in decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude are based. |
| coordinateUncertaintyInMeters | The horizontal distance (in metres) from the given decimalLatitude and decimalLongitude describing the smallest circle containing the whole of the Location. Leave the value empty if the uncertainty is unknown, cannot be estimated or is not applicable (because there are no coordinates). Zero is not a valid value for this term. |
| georeferencedBy | A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations who determined the georeference (spatial representation) for the Location. |
| identifiedBy | A list (concatenated and separated) of names of people, groups or organisations who assigned the Taxon to the subject. |
| scientificName | The full scientific name, with authorship and date information, if known. When forming part of an Identification, this should be the name in lowest level taxonomic rank that can be determined. This term should not contain identification qualifications, which should instead be supplied in the IdentificationQualifier term. |
| kingdom | The full scientific name of the kingdom in which the taxon is classified. |
| phylum | The full scientific name of the phylum or division in which the taxon is classified. |
| class | The full scientific name of the class in which the taxon is classified. |
| order | The full scientific name of the order in which the taxon is classified. |
| family | The full scientific name of the family in which the taxon is classified. |
| taxonomicStatus | The status of the use of the scientificName as a label for a taxon. Requires taxonomic opinion to define the scope of a taxon. Rules of priority then are used to define the taxonomic status of the nomenclature contained in that scope, combined with the expert's opinion. It must be linked to a specific taxonomic reference that defines the concept. |
| acceptedNameUsage | The full name, with authorship and date information, if known, of the currently accepted taxon. |
| vernacularName | A common or vernacular name. |
| genus | The full scientific name of the genus in which the taxon is classified. |
| specificEpithet | The name of the first or species epithet of the scientificName. |
| scientificNameAuthorship | The authorship information for the scientificName formatted according to the conventions of the applicable nomenclaturalCode. |
| infraspecificEpithet | The name of the lowest or terminal infraspecific epithet of the scientificName, excluding any rank designation. |
| taxonRank | The taxonomic rank of the most specific name in the scientificName. |
| nomenclaturalCode | The nomenclatural code (or codes in the case of an ambiregnal name) under which the scientificName is constructed. |
Additional information
During the seventy years’ observation period (1947-2018), 108 taxa from 39 families were observed. Almost all were flowering plants (only one fern species and one conifer species were recorded), mostly Magnoliopsida (98%). This paper includes 91 specimens and 747 occurrence data of vascular plants recorded in Dokdo Islands regarding 108 taxa identified to infraspecific level. The confirmed species comprise 75 dicots and 31 monocots, one gymnosperm and a non-seed plant (Pteridophytes) species. Most species are native, including Cyrtomiumfalcatum (L.f.) C.Presl, Dianthuslongicalyx Miq., Tetragoniatetragonoides (Pall.) Kuntze, Fallopiasachalinensis (F.Schmidt) Ronse Decr., Lysimachiamauritiana Lam., Sedumoryzifolium Makino, CorydalisheterocarpaSiebold & Zucc.var.japonica (Franch. & Sav.) Ohwi and Orobanchecoerulescens Stephan (Fig. 2). The data collected during the last seven decades indicate continuous expansion of invasive species and increase in their richness (Fig. 3). For instance, Bromuscatharticus Vahl, Sonchusasper (L.) Hill., Seneciovulgaris L., Setariapumila (Poir.) Roem. & Schult. and Lycopersiconesculentum Mill. are the most rapidly expanding aliens in the last decade, threatening native flora (Table 2, Fig. 3). Park et al. (2017) identified increased human visitation as a major predictor of the spatial distribution of invasive species in the flora of Dokdo Islands, assuming a positive relationship between human activities and alien plant species richness. The major threatening species, especially the invasive grass, Bromuscatharticus Vahl., affects several native species. Regarding the colonisation status, 14% of total species richness were invasive species and 86% were native to the Korean Peninsula and adjacent islands.
Native species in Dokdo Islands.
Figure 2a.

Cyrtomiumfalcatum (L.f.) C.Presl
Figure 2b.

Dianthuslongicalyx Miq.
Figure 2c.

Tetragoniatetragonoides (Pall.) Kuntze
Figure 2d.

Fallopiasachalinensis (F.Schmidt) Ronse Decr.
Figure 2e.

CorydalisheterocarpaSiebold & Zucc.var.japonica (Franch. & Sav.) Ohwi
Figure 2f.

Orobanchecoerulescens Stephan.
Figure 3.
Species richness (histogram, left) and percentage of invasive species (line, right) in Dokdo Islands.
Acknowledgements
We are grateful to the Korea National Arboretum for supporting and using the integrated publishing toolkit (IPT) server. This work was supported by grants of BIFA to Chin-Sung Chang (BIFA4_015).
References
- Amano Tatsuya, Lamming James D. L., Sutherland William J. Spatial gaps in global biodiversity information and the role of citizen science. BioScience. 2016;66(5):393–400. doi: 10.1093/biosci/biw022. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Ariño Arturo H., Chavan Vishwas, Otegui Javier. Best practice guide for data gap analysis for biodiversity stakeholders. GBIF Secretariat. 2016 doi: 10.13140/rg.2.2.14018.17608. [DOI]
- Boakes Elizabeth H., McGowan Philip J. K., Fuller Richard A., Chang-qing Ding, Clark Natalie E., O'Connor Kim, Mace Georgina M. Distorted views of iodiversity: spatial and temporal bias in species occurrence data. PLOS Biology. 2010;8(6) doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1000385. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Chang Chin Sung, Kim Hui, Chang Kae Sun. Provisional checklist of Vascular plants for the Korea Peninsula Flora (KPF) Designpost; Seoul: 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Chapman Arthur D. Principles of data quality. Global Biodiversity Information Facility. 2005 doi: 10.15468/doc.jrgg-a190. [DOI]
- Chavan Vishwas, Penev Lyubomir. The data paper: a mechanism to incentivize data publishing in biodiversity science. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12 doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-s15-s2. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Faith Dan, Collen Ben, Ariño Arturo, Patricia Koleff Patricia Koleff, Guinotte John, Kerr Jeremy, Chavan Vishwas. Bridging the biodiversity data gaps: Recommendations to meet users’ data needs. Biodiversity Informatics. 2013;8(2) doi: 10.17161/bi.v8i2.4126. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hartter Joel, Ryan Sadie J., MacKenzie Catrina A., Parker John N., Strasser Carly A. Spatially explicit data: Stewardship and ethical challenges in science. PLOS Biology. 2013;11(9) doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001634. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hortal JOAQUÍN, Lobo JORGE M., Jiménez‐Valverde ALBERTO. Limitations of biodiversity databases: Case study on seed‐plant diversity in Tenerife, Canary Islands. Conservation Biology. 2007;21(3):853–863. doi: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2007.00686.x. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Hortal Joaquín, Jiménez-Valverde Alberto, Gómez José F., Lobo Jorge M., Baselga Andrés. Historical bias in biodiversity inventories affects the observed environmental niche of the species. Oikos. 2008;117(6):847–858. doi: 10.1111/j.0030-1299.2008.16434.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Hyun J. O., Kwon S. K. In: Report on the detailed survey of Dokdo ecosystem. Kim J. H., Eun Y., editors. Ministry of Environment; Seoul: 2006. Flora of Dokdo.35-44. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Jo Jaeguk, Park Chanhong, Kim Changhwan, Shin Dongbok. Clay mineral characteristics in volcanic tuffs of Dokdo, South Korea: implication on their genesis and evolution. Environmental Earth Sciences. 2021;80(7) doi: 10.1007/s12665-021-09583-w. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Jung Su-Young, Byun Jun-Gi, Park Soo-Hyun, Oh Seung-Hwan, Yang Jong-Cheol, Jang Jeong-Won, Chang Kae-Sun, Lee You-Mi. The study of distribution characteristics of vascular and naturalized plants in Dokdo, South Korea. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity. 2014;7(2) doi: 10.1016/j.japb.2014.03.011. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kim Chang Hwan, Park Jae Woo, Lee Myoung Hoon, Park Chan Hong. Detailed bathymetry and submarine terraces in the coastal area of the Dokdo Volcano in the Ulleung Basin, the East Sea (Sea of Japan) Journal of Coastal Research. 2013;65:523–528. doi: 10.2112/si65-089.1. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Kim C. H., Lee S. H. In: Dokdo ecosystem detail survey. Lee J. H., editor. National Institute of Ecology; Seochun: 2016. Flora of Dokdo.66-78. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Kim Hui, Lee ChulHo. DMZ Botanic Garden; 2021. [2021-11-01T00:00:00+02:00]. Vascular plants occurrences in Dokdo islands, Korea, based on herbarium collections and legacy botanical literature. 1.10. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Kim J. S., Park J. J. The story of Dokdo’s nature, weather and currents. Gyeongsangbuk-do; Andong: 2017. 19. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Lee D. B., Joo S. W. Review of flora of Ullung. Collection of dissertations for Liberal Arts and Science of Korea University. 1958;3:223–296. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Lee D. H., Cho S. H., Park J. H. In: Report on monitoring of Dokdo ecosystem. Park J. R., editor. Daegu Local Administration of Environment; Daegu: 2007. Flora of Dokdo.65-96. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Lee T. B. Flora of Dokdo. Nature Conservation. 1978;22:16–19. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Lee Y. N. Record of plant survey in Dokdo. Fisheries. 1952;2:26–31. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Meyer Carsten, Kreft Holger, Guralnick Robert, Jetz Walter. Global priorities for an effective information basis of biodiversity distributions. Nature Communications. 2015;6:8221. doi: 10.1038/ncomms9221. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Park J. H., Lee D. H. In: Nature of Dokdo. Research Institute for Ulleungdo & Dokdo Islands Kyungpook National University., editor. Kyungpook University Press; Daegu: 2008. Plants of Dokdo.166-210. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Park J. H., Lee W., Yoon J. S., Jang D. H. In: The Dokdo Nature Reserve monitoring 2013. Institute for Ulleungdo & Dokdo Islands Kyungpook National University., editor. Cultural Heritage Administration; Daegu: 2014. The flora of Dokdo monitoring.10-37. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Park J. H., Lee W., Yoon J. S. In: The Dokdo Nature Reserve sourcebook. Institute for Ulleungdo & Dokdo Islands Kyungpook National University., editor. Gyeongsangbuk-do; Andong: 2017. The flora of Dokdo.82-145. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Park J. H., Lee W., Yoon J. S. In: The Dokdo Nature Reserve monitoring 2017. Institute for Ulleungdo & Dokdo Islands Kyungpook National University., editor. Cultural Heritage Administration; Daegu: 2018. The flora of Dokdo monitoring.10-39. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Park S. J., Song I. G., Park S. J., Lim D. O. The flora and vegetation of Dokdo Island in Ulleung-gun, Gyeongsanbuk-do. Korean Journal of Environmental Ecology. 2010;24(3):264–278. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Park S. J., Park G. T., Shin J. H., Park R. J., Shin M. J., Cho S. J. In: Dokdo ecosystem detail survey. Park S. J., editor. Daegu Local Administration of Environment; Daegu: 2016. Flora of Dokdo.9-26. Korean. [Google Scholar]
- Penev Lyubomir, Mietchen Daniel, Chavan Vishwas, Hagedorn Gregor, Smith Vincent, Shotton David, Ó Tuama Éamonn, Senderov Viktor, Georgiev Teodor, Stoev Pavel, Groom Quentin, Remsen David, Edmunds Scott. Strategies and guidelines for scholarly publishing of biodiversity data. Research Ideas and Outcomes. 2017;3 doi: 10.3897/rio.3.e12431. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Pouwer R., Willemse L. P.M., Mols J. B., Wieringa J. J. Guidelines for collection data egistration with BRAHMS 6. National Herbarium Nederland; Leiden: 2008. 74. [Google Scholar]
- Rodrigues Ana S. L., Gray Claudia L., Crowter Ben J., Ewers Robert M., Stuart Simon N., Whitten Tony, Manica Andrea. A global assessment of amphibian taxonomic effort and expertise. BioScience. 2010;60(10):798–806. doi: 10.1525/bio.2010.60.10.6. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Soberón Jorge, Jiménez Raul, Golubov Jordan, Koleff Patricia. Assessing completeness of biodiversity databases at different spatial scales. Ecography. 2007;30(1):152–160. doi: 10.1111/j.0906-7590.2007.04627.x. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Song Imgeun, Park Seonjoo. Distribution and management of non-indigenous plants in Dokdo. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy. 2012;42(1):98–107. doi: 10.11110/kjpt.2012.42.1.098. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Song Sung Joon, Park Jinsoon, Ryu Jongseong, Rho Hyun Soo, Kim Won, Khim Jong Seong. Biodiversity hotspot for marine invertebrates around the Dokdo, East Sea, Korea: Ecological checklist revisited. Marine Pollution Bulletin. 2017;119(2):162–170. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.03.068. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- Sun Byung Yun, Sul Mi Ra, Im Jin A, Kim Chul Hwan, Kim Tae Jin. Evolution of endemic vascular plants of Ulleungdo and Dokdo in Korea; floristic and cytotaxonomic characteristics of vascular flora of Dokdo. Korean Journal of Plant Taxonomy. 2002;32(2):143–158. doi: 10.11110/kjpt.2002.32.2.143. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Taylor H. R., Dussex Nicolas, van Heezik Yolanda. Bridging the conservation genetics gap by identifying barriers to implementation for conservation practitioners. Global Ecology and Conservation. 2017;10:231–242. doi: 10.1016/j.gecco.2017.04.001. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wetzel Florian T., Bingham Heather C., Groom Quentin, Haase Peter, Kõljalg Urmas, Kuhlmann Michael, Martin Corinne S., Penev Lyubomir, Robertson Tim, Saarenmaa Hannu, Schmeller Dirk S., Stoll Stefan, Tonkin Jonathan D., Häuser Christoph L. Unlocking biodiversity data: Prioritization and filling the gaps in biodiversity observation data in Europe. Biological Conservation. 2018;221:78–85. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2017.12.024. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- Wieczorek John, Guo Qinghua, Hijmans Robert. The point-radius method for georeferencing locality descriptions and calculating associated uncertainty. International Journal of Geographical Information Science. 2010;18(8):745–767. doi: 10.1080/13658810412331280211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]

