Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2023 Mar 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Hum Biol. 2021 Jun 28;34(3):e23634. doi: 10.1002/ajhb.23634

Table 4.

Predicting change in weight (kg) from time point (compared to mid-course checkpoint 1 - observations = 346)a

model 1
model 2
model 3
coef 95% CI p coef 95% CI p coef 95% CI p
main effects
time pointb
   pre-course 0.65 (−0.12, 1.42) 0.098 0.82 (0.23, 1.41) 0.006 0.33 (−0.37, 1.04) 0.356
   checkpoint 2 1.64 (0.86, 2.42) 0.001 1.54 (0.95, 2.14) 0.001 1.21 (0.56, 1.86) 0.001
   checkpoint 3 1.70 (0.91, 2.49) 0.001 1.57 (0.97, 2.17) 0.001 1.40 (0.78, 2.01) 0.001
   post-course 1.01 (0.22, 1.80) 0.012 0.82 (0.22, 1.42) 0.008 1.00 (0.38, 1.61) 0.001
sex (male)c 13.70 (9.24, 18.16) 0.001
13.59 (9.19, 17.99) 0.001 13.61 (9.22, 18.00) 0.001
interaction terms
time point x sex
   pre-course x sex 0.40 (−0.79, 1.59) 0.507 - - - - - -
   checkpoint 2 x sex −0.24 (−1.45, 0.96) 0.693 - - - - - -
   checkpoint 3 x sex −0.31 (−1.52, 0.90) 0.617 - - - - - -
   post-course x sex −0.44 (−1.65, 0.76) 0.471 - - - - - -
covariates
age 0.16 (−.20, 0.51) 0.388 0.16 (−0.20, 0.51) 0.390 0.16 (−0.20, 0.51) 0.390
activity difficulty −0.67 (−1.22, −0.12) 0.017
a

coef and 95% CI from Linear Mixed Models

b

comparison for variables compared to checkpoint 1

c

sex: 1 = male; 0 = female