Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 14;12:727371. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2021.727371

Figure 2.

Figure 2

The effect of CLZ on BWG, CFI and feeding efficiency. (A) BWG, Two-way repeated ANOVA (Treatment×Time as repeated measures) showed significant main effects of Weeks (F 3, 160 = 238.4, p < 0.0001), Treatment (F 4, 160 = 40.79, p < 0.0001) with a significant interaction between the two factors (F 12, 160 = 3.604, p < 0.0001) on BWG; (B) CFI, Two-way repeated ANOVA also revealed that significant main effects of Weeks (F 3, 40 = 929.9, p < 0.0001), Treatment (F 4, 40 = 20.26, p < 0.0001) with a significant interaction between the two factors (F 12, 40 = 0.0295, p < 0.0001) on CFI; (C) feeding efficiency, Two-way repeated ANOVA (Treatment×Time as repeated measures) showed significant main effects of Weeks (F 3, 40 = 49.65, p < 0.0001), Treatment (F 4, 40 = 33.98, p < 0.0001) with no interaction between the two factors (F 12, 40 = 0.8380, p=0.6123) on feeding efficiency.