TABLE 2.

Relationship between body composition variables and values of C_An, C_Aer, and C_Total for the 50, 100, and 200 m.

		LMTotal	LMTrunk	LMLL	LMUL	ILM	IApp
CAn	50 m	0.85**	0.86**	0.82**	0.81**	0.76**	0.74**
		(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(99%)
	100 m	0.68**	0.68**	0.64**	0.70**	0.65**	0.64**
		(97%)	(97%)	(95%)	(98%)	(95%)	(95%)
	200 m	0.85**	0.86**	0.83**	0.82**	0.77**	0.75**
		(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(100%)
CAer	50 m	0.56**	0.54**	0.56**	0.57**	0.47*	0.52**
		(84%)	(82%)	(84%)	(86%)	(67%)	(76%)
	100 m	0.75**	0.71**	0.73**	0.73**	0.65**	0.71**
		(100%)	(99%)	(100%)	(99%)	(95%)	(99%)
	200 m	0.56**	0.54**	0.59**	0.46*	0.41*	0.45*
		(84%)	(82%)	(88%)	(66%)	(53%)	(63%)
CTotal	50 m	0.85**	0.86**	0.83**	0.82**	0.75**	0.75**
		(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(100%)
	100 m	0.78**	0.77**	0.76**	0.79**	0.73**	0.74**
		(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(99%)	(99%)
	200 m	0.78**	0.78**	0.79**	0.71**	0.65**	0.66**
		(100%)	(100%)	(100%)	(98%)	(95%)	(96%)

Obs.: Data are showing the coefficient (r) and sample power in percentage.

Significantly different at ρ ≤ 0.05* and ≤0.01**.

LM_Total, LM_Trunk, LM_LL, and LM_UL are lean mass in whole-body, trunk and lower and upper limbs, and I_LM and I_App are lean mass index and appendicular lean mass index.