Table 4.

Regression analysis of remodelling for predicting outcomes during 5 year follow‐up from 1 year CMR scan in 97 patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction

	Univariable Cox analysis
	Hazard ratio	P value
% ∆ LVEF, per 10% increase	0.85 (0.64, 1.13)	0.26
% ∆ LVEDVi, per 10% increase	1.07 (0.85, 1.34)	0.58
% ∆ LVESVi, per 10% increase	1.09 (0.96, 1.22)	0.20
% ∆ LV massi, per 10% increase	1.27 (1.03, 1.56)	0.026
% ∆ LV mass/LVEDV, per 0.1 increase	1.17 (0.99, 1.39)	0.062
% ∆ RVEF, per 10% increase	0.99 (0.89, 1.10)	0.86
% ∆ RVEDVi, per 10% increase	1.01 (0.86, 1.19)	0.87
% ∆ RVESVi, per 10% increase	1.07 (0.96, 1.20)	0.22
% ∆ LAVi, per 10% increase	1.05 (0.95, 1.15)	0.34
% ∆ GLS, per 1% increase	1.00 (0.98, 1.02)	0.93
% ∆ GCS, per 1% increase	0.99 (0.97, 1.01)	0.34
∆ Scar mass, per 10 g increase a	2.34 (0.55, 10.4)	0.24
∆ Scar % LV, per 10% increase a	2.24 (0.34, 14.7)	0.40

^a 51/97 patients had late gadolinium enhancement imaging at both baseline and 1 year (9 events).