Skip to main content
. 2021 Sep 12;8(6):5222–5236. doi: 10.1002/ehf2.13601

Table 3.

Left ventricular reverse remodelling

Responders (n = 37) Non‐responders (n = 6) Responders versus non‐responders
ESV (mL)
Baseline 144 ± 12 mL 164 ± 40 mL 0.67
Follow‐up 84 ± 7 mL 178 ± 47 mL P < 0.01
Baseline versus follow‐up P < 0.01 0.82
EDV (mL)
Baseline 204 ± 14 mL 247 ± 46 mL 0.21
Follow‐up 145 ± 9 mL 246 ± 54 mL P <0.01
Baseline versus follow‐up P < 0.01 0.98
EF biplane (%)
Baseline 31 ± 1% 35 ± 3% 0.19
Follow‐up 44 ± 1% 30 ± 3% P<0.01
Baseline versus follow‐up P < 0.01 0.22

EDV, end‐diastolic volume; EF biplane, ejection fraction measured from echocardiographic four‐chamber and two‐chamber views combined; ESV, end‐systolic volume.

Values are estimated marginal mean ± SEM.