Skip to main content
. 2021 Dec 28;2021(12):CD010622. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010622.pub2

Cubas 2009.

Study characteristics
Methods Study design:parallel randomised controlled trial
Participants Inclusion criteria: people with diagnosis of multinodular goitre; all of them had subclinical hyperthyroidism (which was treated with methimazole), or were euthyroid
Exclusion criteria: people had previous surgery, TSH‐suppressive therapy with T4, or radioactive iodine treatment, serious medical conditions
Diagnostic criteria: the diagnosis was based on either by palpation or US, and 131I thyroid scintigraphy. US‐guided fine needle aspiration biopsy of suspicious and dominant nodules to exclude malignancy
Setting: outpatients
Age group: adults
Gender distribution: 93% female
Country where trial was performed: Brazil
Interventions Intervention(s): participants in group A (N = 9)received a single intramuscular dose of 1.0 mL (0.1 mg) of rhTSH; participants in group B (N = 9) received 0.005 mg of rhTSH, also in a single intramuscular injection, 24 hr before 131I therapy
Comparator(s): 1.0 mL isotonic saline was intramuscularly injected 24 hr prior to the 131I therapy
Duration of intervention: 1 day
Duration of follow‐up: 24 months
Run‐in period: none
Number of trial centres: 1
Outcomes Reported outcome(s) in full text of publication: thyroid volume reduction, radioactive iodine uptake, thyroid function tests, adverse effects (hyperthyroidism and thyroid enlargement)
Study details Trial identifier: not reported
Trial terminated early: no
Publication details Language of publication: English
Funding: Genzyme do Brasil
Publication status: peer‐reviewed journal
Stated aim for study Quote: "to evaluate whether rhTSH increases the efficacy of a fixed activity of 131I for the treatment of multinodular goitre"
Notes  
Risk of bias
Bias Authors' judgement Support for judgement
Random sequence generation (selection bias) Unclear risk Quote: "three treatment protocols were designed and patients were randomly assigned"
Comment: not enough details
Allocation concealment (selection bias) Unclear risk Comment: no details
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
Objective outcomes Low risk Comment: outcomes unlikely influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of participants and personnel (performance bias)
Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no details
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Objective outcomes Low risk Comment: outcomes unlikely influenced by lack of blinding
Blinding of outcome assessment (detection bias)
Subjective outcomes Unclear risk Comment: no details
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Objective outcomes Low risk Quote: "In the placebo group, a 71‐year‐old female died 8 months after treatment of complications of an unrelated ischemic cerebral stroke"
Incomplete outcome data (attrition bias)
Subjective outcomes Low risk Quote: "In the placebo group, a 71‐year‐old female died 8 months after treatment of complications of an unrelated ischemic cerebral stroke"
Selective reporting (reporting bias) Low risk Comment: none detected
Other bias Low risk Comment: none detected