. 2021 Dec 18;5:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.crfs.2021.12.004

Table 4.

Water mobility results of native chestnut starch and dry heat treated starch.

Samples	T₂ (ms)	T₂₁ (ms)	T₂₂ (ms)	T₂₃ (ms)
Control	272.48 ± 1.96^f	299.94 ± 17.45^d	853.06 ± 18.41^d	8343.11 ± 278.80^b
CT-3	250.12 ± 1.16^e	280.78 ± 21.69^bcd	754.05 ± 50.74^bc	7941.76 ± 707.53^ab
CT-6	244.91 ± 0.70^cd	204.01 ± 21.94^ab	722.00 ± 28.08^abc	7572.18 ± 136.40^ab
CT-9	241.68 ± 2.35^abc	214.19 ± 18.09^a	704.71 ± 21.75^abc	7141.34 ± 139.71^a
CT-12	238.94 ± 0.50^a	216.53 ± 36.67^abc	678.24 ± 11.32^ab	6985.39 ± 477.83^a
RT-2	245.65 ± 2.26^d	250.47 ± 13.39^abcd	776.64 ± 82.01^cd	7586.55 ± 706.59^ab
RT-3	243.24 ± 0.30^bcd	280.35 ± 13.84^bcd	712.66 ± 1.65^abc	7208.77 ± 213.13^a
RT-4	241.24 ± 1.84^ab	290.67 ± 70.14^cd	647.84 ± 20.05^a	7019.88 ± 156.07^a

Note: CS, native chestnut starch; CT-3, CT-6, CT-9, CT-12, preparation of chestnut starch by continuous dry heat treatment for 3 h, 6 h, 9 h, 12 h, respectively; RT-2, RT-3, RT-4, preparation of chestnut starch by repeated dry heat treatment for two cycles, three cycles, four cycles, respectively. Results are showed as mean values ± SD in triplicate. Different letters in the same column show a significant difference at p < 0.05.